cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/29640152

On July 29, 2025, LinkedIn removed “misgendering or deadnaming” from examples of prohibited content in its policy on hateful and derogatory content.

  • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    What this means is that you’re misremembering some study, are quoting a right wing hit piece, or are just pulling shit out of your ass.

    Whatever fantasy lets you feel like you’re the superior being, I guess. But actual good faith discussion, you clearly have no interest in, so I’ll leave you to your fuming.

    Hope you improve.

    By the way, re

    How in the world are you going to have a study with any kind of statistical reliability, when you are polling trans people WHO ARE IN THE FUCKING CLOSET??!!

    You do understand what those words mean, do you not? You’re talking about people who are not out. You’re talking about people who are not publicly out as trans. So obviously you can’t poll these people when trying to survey the trans population.

    Did it ever occur to you that trans people who are now out can share their experiences from before they were out? This is like saying you can’t learn anything about childhood experiences by talking to adults.

    “Just think about for a second. Actually THINK about it man!”

    • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      No study on Earth would be published using such a flawed methodology. You can’t just retrospectively study people’s past opinions like that, compared them to current trans people, and expect any kind of reliability. No one would approve a study design like that. You’re full of it.