• BlueMonday1984@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 days ago

    Baldur Bjarnason has given his thoughts:

    I mean… yeah.

    Also, between this and seeing tech types link glowingly to a crazypants “colonise the light cone by exploring latent space” type of delusional bullshit and I’m staring to worry that computers, as a concept, might not be salvageable after these clowns have run the show into the ground

    • Seminar2250@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      colonise the light cone by exploring latent space

      Can someone explain what this is referring to? I don’t understand it.

      • froztbyte@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        references these two topics. I suspect the phrase itself in this case is a shitpost taking aim at some of the absurd bullshit TESCREALists come up with in their nonsensegabble, but … it is also the kind of nonsensegabble that some of them may unironically post

        • Seminar2250@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          19 hours ago

          is it cynical that i find the idea of a “latent space” a bit goofy? may just be because i think data science is kind of a joke and much machine learning is “we threw shit at our model but don’t know what a category error is”

          like it’s just dimensionality reduction with new vocab?

        • froztbyte@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          23 hours ago

          (related tangent: @cstross’ Singularity series is a pretty fun topical dive about this, and he’s been following these nutjobs for probably close to 3 decades now)