Jesus Christ, you’re somehow losing the ability to follow a conversation.
Why are you quoting yourself?
It is sexist no matter the context, I’m not using it against anyone so I’m not a bigot I’m just exampling a bigoted word. You’re being obtuse. Is there a way to remove the intended insult from the hard r? No. Can you remove the intended insult from mansplaining? No. So both of those are always bigoted at times you might argue there’s some moral reason to do it but that’s all ex post facto.
It’s sexist. If you need to see me as a bigot to get that across the so be it but you know as well as I do your argument is void of logic.
Use it in a sentence in the correct context, I’ll leave it to you to prove you can remove the insult from it.
No, its always sexist. Point to where I said the person using it is always a sexist. What I’ve said is if you’re saying someone is mansplaining you’re in fact a sexist and I’ve said you cannot remove the intended insult.
Turns out you weren’t even asking a question you’re demanding an example, your inconsistencies are just stacking up bud.
Forgive me here, at what point in this prolonged attempt to jam your head as deeply as possible into your own ass does this end or is this some sort of masturbatory ouroboros?
Jesus Christ, you’re somehow losing the ability to follow a conversation.
Why are you quoting yourself?
It is sexist no matter the context, I’m not using it against anyone so I’m not a bigot I’m just exampling a bigoted word. You’re being obtuse. Is there a way to remove the intended insult from the hard r? No. Can you remove the intended insult from mansplaining? No. So both of those are always bigoted at times you might argue there’s some moral reason to do it but that’s all ex post facto.
It’s sexist. If you need to see me as a bigot to get that across the so be it but you know as well as I do your argument is void of logic.
So it seems like what you’re trying to say is that it’s possible for you to use that word without being a sexist, depending on the context?
Yes or no?
Use it in a sentence in the correct context, I’ll leave it to you to prove you can remove the insult from it.
No, its always sexist. Point to where I said the person using it is always a sexist. What I’ve said is if you’re saying someone is mansplaining you’re in fact a sexist and I’ve said you cannot remove the intended insult.
Let’s try this again.
Yes or no:
Is it possible for you to use the word “mansplain” without being a sexist, depending on the context?
Yes. We’ve gone over this. You can use it without being a sexist.
You cannot use it in the proper context without being a sexist ie. “Greg is mansplaining baseball.” Because that’s clearly a sexist insult.
Your think you’re making a point but you’re just rehashing shut you’ve apparently forgotten.
Great!
So can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:
We’ve done this, you’re rehashing your stupid argument again.
https://lemmy.world/comment/18496795
Max depth reached.
Sure, it starts here: https://lemmy.nullspace.lol/comment/61891
No no no, be specific you spent half a day crying about how important it is to directly quote people.
Similarly what sex am i? Though I do love how you peeled back that mask to reveal you are indeed a bigoted nitwit.
Max depth reached.
True or false:
Giving an example of a scenario is a different action from stating that you believe such a scenario could exist.
Turns out you weren’t even asking a question you’re demanding an example, your inconsistencies are just stacking up bud.
Forgive me here, at what point in this prolonged attempt to jam your head as deeply as possible into your own ass does this end or is this some sort of masturbatory ouroboros?
Nowhere in that thread did you answer that question. Feel free to quote your answer and prove me wrong.
Let’s try again:
Can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:
Then you aren’t reading.