Nope you’re asking for an example, I answered your question. Two separate concepts boss. Am that aside for like 5 comments you insisted I didn’t answer and just now you agree I did answer. Did you apologize for being rude about it? No, why would ya huh?
You’re aware I asked you to provide an example before you asked me and you’ve still not provided it. You first homie, let’s see what shit smeared on walls can produce.
I don’t want to play this game. Do the words “either way go away” in some way express enjoyment or contentment to pursue the conversation? This is why I say you have a rapist mentality.
You’re being willfully obtuse or you’re an actual moron you’re honestly making it kinda hard to determine.
I’ll restate this again according to you.
Bill explained baseball to me condescendingly.
Bill mansplained baseball to me.
These are the same sentence, neither is more insulting than the other, neither is sexist though it refers derogatorily to one sex specifically.
These are the same sentence, neither is more insulting than the other, neither is sexist though it refers derogatorily to one sex specifically.
Wrong. Would you like me to link you directly to where I defined mansplaining as being “misogynistically condescending”? I’m happy to do that instead of linking to a random comment in the thread and insisting that it’s there somewhere.
You completely skipped over the go away part so you can play this dumb fuckin game.
Then what’s your argument if you agree it’s misogynistic then you agree it’s sexist at which point what is your disagreement aside from you being apparently generally disagreeable and apparently unavailable to leave me alone.
Keep asking whenever you’d like but I’m not playing this game with you. I provided two separate answers that happen to be the same, just read the comment chain again.
Literally just read the comment chain and quit asking the same question over and over. You’re not going to get the answer you want with a rapist mentality either boss but it does kinda evidence how gross you’re willing to be.
It’s funny, every time you’ve accused me of not answering a question, I’ve provided screenshots and direct quotes. Pretty disingenuous of you not to do the same.
I provided two separate answers that happen to be the same, just read the comment chain again
I believe that you believe that’s true. But having read that thread, I see nothing resembling an answer to that question. And since you refuse to just quote it, I have to assume it’s just buried in your unreadable grammar and mess of typos.
So let’s try this again:
Can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:
Yeah let’s complain about that while badgering sometime until they give you the answer you want… The one you’ve already gotten.
It’s that all that was in that comment chain or even in that response to your question? No! You didn’t even bother quoting the direct answer. So tell me how I’m wrong about your reading comprehension.
I have. Many times, you refuse to accept the obvious and ignore everything I’ve said that doesn’t support your point. Why should I prove anything to you at this point, you don’t care about the point you care about winning which is why you insult me when you can’t think of an argument.
You’re a bully, so why should anyone play with you let alone me?
B. How can we discuss this subject without me necessarily use it.
C. Using a word as an example isn’t the same as using it in it’s intended context.
D. You didn’t make an argument you made an insult that didn’t even particularly make sense but it’s intent was clear. That’s ad hominem, trying to hedge your way out by claiming it’s part of this brilliant scheme you think you’re conducting is at best disingenuous.
E. No I lost conclude you don’t understand logic, example, reasoning or basic critical thinking.
I won’t concede something that isn’t factual, you’re celebrating a win when you’re at the starting line homie.
No it concedes that I’m using a bigoted word in a discussion about said bigoted word. It’s really not hard to figure out unless you’re trying to be blind.
Not at all, I know it’s bigoted, you just admitted it was bigoted and thus you agree with me. Duh.
It is, you can’t remove the racist insult from the hard r and you can’t erase the sexism from mansplaining they are inherent.
No your argument is janky at best and we know that because you devolved to insults rather than discussion.
It is though it is amusing you just described what just did as your example of ad hominem.
You doesn’t respond to a single one, you insulted me that’s called abandoninga position to attack me instead ie: ad hominem.
Nope not at all. I said it’s a bigoted word and if you use it as it’s intended you’re a bigot. This isn’t difficult.
All the parts you’re intentionally ignoring to make your dipshit gotcha point.
Nice try! I was asking you, via question, for an example.
Which you’ve, once again, failed to produce. I wonder why that could be…
Nope you’re asking for an example, I answered your question. Two separate concepts boss. Am that aside for like 5 comments you insisted I didn’t answer and just now you agree I did answer. Did you apologize for being rude about it? No, why would ya huh?
You’re aware I asked you to provide an example before you asked me and you’ve still not provided it. You first homie, let’s see what shit smeared on walls can produce.
What did you ask for an example of? I will happily answer the question instead of sending you on an asinine wild goose chase.
Read. The. Comments.
Why do you insist I need to hand everything to you?
Ed: wild goose chase? You have to look one fuckin place, one. Why the dramatics?
See, I just want to answer your question, but you just seem to want to play this little game.
Alright then. So ctrl-f of “example” doesn’t show you asking me for an example of anything.
Guess we need to start at the top to see if you’re using some other words to mean “give me an example of X”.
Is it that?
I don’t want to play this game. Do the words “either way go away” in some way express enjoyment or contentment to pursue the conversation? This is why I say you have a rapist mentality.
You’re being willfully obtuse or you’re an actual moron you’re honestly making it kinda hard to determine.
I’ll restate this again according to you.
Bill explained baseball to me condescendingly.
Bill mansplained baseball to me.
These are the same sentence, neither is more insulting than the other, neither is sexist though it refers derogatorily to one sex specifically.
Wrong. Would you like me to link you directly to where I defined mansplaining as being “misogynistically condescending”? I’m happy to do that instead of linking to a random comment in the thread and insisting that it’s there somewhere.
You completely skipped over the go away part so you can play this dumb fuckin game.
Then what’s your argument if you agree it’s misogynistic then you agree it’s sexist at which point what is your disagreement aside from you being apparently generally disagreeable and apparently unavailable to leave me alone.
Max comment depth reached.
I’m just going to keep asking this question until you either quote your alleged answer, or give a new one:
Can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:
Neat.
Keep asking whenever you’d like but I’m not playing this game with you. I provided two separate answers that happen to be the same, just read the comment chain again.
Literally just read the comment chain and quit asking the same question over and over. You’re not going to get the answer you want with a rapist mentality either boss but it does kinda evidence how gross you’re willing to be.
It’s funny, every time you’ve accused me of not answering a question, I’ve provided screenshots and direct quotes. Pretty disingenuous of you not to do the same.
I believe that you believe that’s true. But having read that thread, I see nothing resembling an answer to that question. And since you refuse to just quote it, I have to assume it’s just buried in your unreadable grammar and mess of typos.
So let’s try this again:
Can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:
And I’ve directly linked the content chain that provides your answer, so crying because I’m not doing it in a dumber way.
Yeah we get it you have a reading comprehension issue, move on.
Keep asking the same question and I’m hoping to link the same answer but no no, keep on asking until you get a yes. That’s a reasonable way to act.
Hmm, okay, I’ll guess again!
Is it this?
Because that also doesn’t answer my question, if so.
Try again genius, it’s not like it’s in the first 7 words or anything.
Hmm, it can’t be that. The first 7 words of what you linked are:
Which is definitely not an answer to the question:
Can you give me a single example of a scenario where a woman could:
I get that reading is an issue for you but there’s not that many comments, I’m sure you can figure it out for yourself.
Look who’s abandoning their argument in favor of an ad hominem. What a surprise.
Let’s see if I can guess what you think you wrote that answers my question!
Is it this?
Because that does not answer my question.
Yeah let’s complain about that while badgering sometime until they give you the answer you want… The one you’ve already gotten.
It’s that all that was in that comment chain or even in that response to your question? No! You didn’t even bother quoting the direct answer. So tell me how I’m wrong about your reading comprehension.
So you can’t show me how my conclusion isn’t sound based on the logic you laid out?
I have. Many times, you refuse to accept the obvious and ignore everything I’ve said that doesn’t support your point. Why should I prove anything to you at this point, you don’t care about the point you care about winning which is why you insult me when you can’t think of an argument.
You’re a bully, so why should anyone play with you let alone me?
No you haven’t.
This is what we’re doing now?
That’s really up to you.
You can either demonstrate how your logic doesn’t result in you calling yourself a bigot, or concede that you are one.
You keep saying it’s an ad hominem, but I’m not saying your argument is invalid because you’re a bigot.
I’m saying either your logic isn’t sound, or if it is, then you must conclude that you are a bigot as a result of it.
You refuse to concede that your logic isn’t sound, so therefore…
A. I’m not saying it isn’t bigoted.
B. How can we discuss this subject without me necessarily use it.
C. Using a word as an example isn’t the same as using it in it’s intended context.
D. You didn’t make an argument you made an insult that didn’t even particularly make sense but it’s intent was clear. That’s ad hominem, trying to hedge your way out by claiming it’s part of this brilliant scheme you think you’re conducting is at best disingenuous.
E. No I lost conclude you don’t understand logic, example, reasoning or basic critical thinking.
I won’t concede something that isn’t factual, you’re celebrating a win when you’re at the starting line homie.
That’s not what I said. Read more carefully.
I said your logic concludes that you are bigoted for using it.
You probably can’t, which really puts you in a corner, logically.
You previously stated that it is sexist in any context. So that’s irrelevant.
My argument is perfectly clear: it’s that your logic is flawed.
Again, no it’s not. An ad hominem is when you use a character attack to discredit an argument. That’s not what I’m doing.
Lol
That’s exactly what you’re arguing.
No it concedes that I’m using a bigoted word in a discussion about said bigoted word. It’s really not hard to figure out unless you’re trying to be blind.
Not at all, I know it’s bigoted, you just admitted it was bigoted and thus you agree with me. Duh.
It is, you can’t remove the racist insult from the hard r and you can’t erase the sexism from mansplaining they are inherent.
No your argument is janky at best and we know that because you devolved to insults rather than discussion.
It is though it is amusing you just described what just did as your example of ad hominem.
An error? Who makes those?! Grow up