If the images here don’t load, try using a different frontend.

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    5 days ago

    Honestly doesn’t surprise me that they re-invited the guy, especially when he got fired. If he was there for a longer time, he’ll leave a hole which is gonna match his skillset pretty well.

    And the hiring manager isn’t the firing manager, so they won’t know who got thrown out for what reason. Their job is just to hire someone new and boy-howdy did they just find the perfect match for the opening.

    • Mac@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      6 days ago

      At my old job we had “uniforms” which meant: a polo with a logo on it.

      • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        I heard about dress codes before, even about enforcing them, but never about uniform requirements. Wild.

        • wieson@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          5 days ago

          At my job, they give out company polos and t-shirts, but no requirement to wear them. We’re just being asked to wear them if a client is coming or if there’s an in-house exhibition.

          As someone else wrote, I also prefer to wear out the gifted clothes rather than my own.

          • DeviantOvary@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            5 days ago

            Same here, re: the first paragraph. I received two shirts and a (good quality) windbreaker. I’ve never heard anyone having to buy company uniforms, but I’m in Europe.

            • jqubed@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              5 days ago

              As an American, I think the only time I’ve ever paid for a company-branded clothing item was when one company offered us (completely optional) customized soccer jerseys in celebration of that year’s World Cup. They were actually pretty nice! But, I’ve never worked anywhere a uniform was mandatory.

              Perhaps the biggest disappointment in losing my last job (besides the steady paycheck and the best health insurance plan I’d ever had) was that I’d only a couple months earlier collected enough corporate t-shirts to wear a different company-branded shirt each day of the week.

              • 5too@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 days ago

                From my fast food work experience - all those people helping you paid for their own uniforms.

        • Mac@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          I also like Wild and Flamboyant Hedonism but how is that related

    • Ledivin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      5 days ago

      My first job did, for some reason. It was just a polo, so it wasn’t a big deal, but I did think it was weird since we never had customers or anything like that at the office 🤷‍♂️

    • bss03@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      We had $company-shirt day where we were encouraged to wear them, but no hard requirement.

    • yyprum@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      I once worked as paid practice at a company that required all employees to wear a business suit and tie or whatever the female version of that is. Every day, to go sit in front of the computer and meet literally always the same people, tie and a suit.

      My practice ended, and they were very happy with me and asked me to stay longer. I said Lol no and left to never look back.

  • qaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Does anyone know more about the request to add blockchain? (Last image)

    • Aqarius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      86
      ·
      5 days ago

      A few years ago, “blockchain” was what “AI” is now. Everyone was adding blockchain to everything. It was the next big thing, we can’t risk getting left behind, etc.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        And it was a fundamentally bad system from the get go for 99.9% of the systems it was applied to, just like AI.

        AI, btw, was just the thing that made people finally forget about blockchain technology, but as per usual, its worse than its predecessor.

        IT has this innate need to have these corporate buzzword cycles that lat about 1-3 years, where all IT companies must jump in this bandwagon for fear of being left behind, and each cycle is just pure uncut unadulterated shit, and each cycle, the shit smells worse.

        • Aqarius@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          5 days ago

          It’s not even IT itself. I vaguely remember some fruit juice company changing its name from “fruit juice” to “fruit juice blockchain” or something, and doing nothing else, and it’s stock price jumping by 3x. The stock market somehow got into its head that tech companies play by fundamentally different rules than normal, are worth inherently more, never have to make profit or even a product, and will someday all be money printing monopolies.

        • phx@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          The funny thing is, AI and blockchain likely could augment a lot of stuff in his ways, but the higher-ups don’t understand the technology or their own product enough to pursue though.

          Especially AI as they see it as a way to replace people or existing stacks/products instead of using it as an assistive technology to improve them

          • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            Blockchain has VERY few practical applications. Even cryptocurrencies work very badly because of blockchains.

            AI at its current level is also about as reliable as a hippie tripping balls on mushrooms. I’ve seen some actual practical applications where AI found new mathematics, for example, and that is great! However, I can literally claim that 99% of AI applications currently are pure shit and not be off by much

        • afaix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          AI at least has its uses and can do something (not always well, but it can be helpful 1/10 times). Blockchain mania was insane though.

          It was like “Why don’t we incorporate a retina scanner into our TV remote”

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      5 days ago

      Simply add a sprinkle of blockchain on top of your inherently centralized hierarchy. Voila! It’s decentralized!

  • TehWorld@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    5 days ago

    The odds are low but I have the opportunity to MAYBE do the funniest thing ever.

    I work in the TV industry. Often enough with video switchers that I had a random overseas person contact me about scheduling a 20 minute interview on my opinion of Software Video Switchers. It’s scheduled for Friday.

    I have ZERO to lose here. I’m gonna drone on about Blockchain.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    5 days ago

    I don’t remember how Xitter works, but how were there no comments interrupting during the approximately 7 hours of posting updates?

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      5 days ago

      Used to be, back before the enshittification, that you could view a thread of just your own tweets and not see a thousand nazis and bots. That was back in the days when a profile had its tweets in chronologist order instead of bullshit nonsense

      • Match!!@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Used to be, back before the enshittification, that you could view a thread of just your own tweets and not see a thousand nazis and bots. That was back in the days when a profile had its tweets in chronological order instead of bullshit nonsense

        • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          5 days ago

          Used to be, back before the enshittification, that you could view a thread of just your own tweets and not see a thousand nazis and bots. That was back in the days when a profile had its tweets in chronological order instead of bullshit nonsense

          • darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            5 days ago

            Used to be, back before the enshittification, that you could view a thread of just your own tweets and not see a thousand nazis and bots. That was back in the days when a profile had its tweets in chronological order instead of bullshit nonsense

    • DarkSirrush@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      This is tumblr, not sitter. You can simply reblog your own post and bypass any comments made halfway through.

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 days ago

      I believe, so long as you as you always reply to your own last post, you can then select your last post in the chain and it’ll only show your own posts. Like, it is tree-shaped under the hood, it just hides that in the UI for whatever reason…

    • Mr.Chewy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      I believe it’s called having a cultured audience, I’d be shocked at the sight as well, don’t get me wrong, but people are able to be civilised when need be