A pilot flying a Delta Air Lines regional jet on Friday apologized to his passengers after making a hard turn to avoid colliding with a US Air Force B-52 bomber, audio from the incident shows.

The incident occurred on SkyWest Flight 3788, which was operating as a Delta Connection flight, from Minneapolis, Minnesota, to Minot, North Dakota, SkyWest said in a statement.

The flight landed safely in Minot “after being cleared for approach by the tower but performed a go-around when another aircraft became visible in their flight path,” the statement read.

  • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    OK, figuratively. From this it seems like there are two (more?) systems that are both sharing airspace that don’t know what the other is doing. That’s all I mean about “sitting in the same room”. Mabye a zoom call?

    You say “different airspace” but there’s only one airspace. It’s the one the planes are flying in.

    • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      No, like I said, they’re using the same systems, the same software, the same hardware. People at different towers talk to each other on the phone and on the radio, especially during handoffs between airspaces. The computers talk to each other. IIRC the information from one tower’s radar is shared with other towers. They’re not parallel systems, it’s all the same system.

      edit: I’ve been using “airspace” to mean “volume controlled by a tower”. There’s many airspaces.

      • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        OK, I get it. There’s FAA and then there’s Air Force? Is there also Army and Marines and Navy? Why don’t they all combine and make one super Voltron of airspace management?

        • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          To quote myself

          I’m not sure why it is like that nowadays. I guess in the beginning of ATC in the US it made sense for air bases to control the nearby airspace, and it probably just went from there, with maybe consolidation of towers as a cost-cutting measure along the way.

          Also,

          IIRC, the Army and Navy also operate their own ATC Yes, there is also Marine-run ATC.

          Spitballing:

          • institutions don’t like losing control
          • Many towers are located on military bases
          • military air traffic controllers need to learn the ropes someplace that isn’t an aircraft carrier or active deployment