The crisis they created by chasing gains with no regard to efficiency.

Edit: I just have to add this is typical capitalist behavior. They are chasing gains at with no regard to the consequences it will have on the public. And now here we are and these CEOs are starting to lobby that the public needs to do something about the electric grid that THEY have overstressed in their pursuit of profit.

Privatize profits, socialize costs, the American Capitalist way.

The power grid crisis that your AIs cause?

Funny that decades of the GOP sabotaging progress on renewable energy like solar and wind, and torpedoing research into modernizing the power grid - specifically because it would make deploying renewable easier, will end up helping to hand the lead of possibly the most consequential industry of the 21st century over to China.

Oh no… anyway

If AI is so smart, why don’t we just ask it to fix the power grid crisis?

It’s a crisis because they want somebody else to pay for it, especially if the AI bubble would pop and all that infrastructure left would stay their responsibility and sunk cost.

No Climate Change will

One of the add more LLM to get AGI guys, alright.

I for one would be happy if the collapse of the power grid killed AI. I would be, if it didn’t also mean the collapse of the entire global economy and the death of thousands of people.

This greedy motherfucker can’t think but 5 minutes ahead.

Nawwwwwww, so sad.

Good

“AI’s natural limit is electricity, not chips,” Schmidt said, cutting through the industry’s semiconductor obsession with characteristic bluntness.

I mean, maybe in the very long term that’s a fundamental limit, and you face things like Dyson spheres.

But right now, I’m personally running one human-level AGI on roughly 100W of power, so I’m just gonna say that as things stand, the prominent limitation is software not being good enough. You’re, like, a software guy.

Ultimately AI is an optimization problem, and if we don’t know how to solve the software problems fully yet, then, yeah, we can be inefficient and dump some of the heavy lifting on the hardware guys to get a small edge.

But I’m pretty sure that the real breakthrough that needs to happen isn’t on the hardware side. Like, my existing PC and GPU already are more capable than my brain from a hardware standpoint. The hardware guys have already done their side and then some compared to human biology. It’s that we haven’t figured out the software to run on them to make them do what we want.

The military or whoever needs AI applications can ask for more hardware money to get an edge relative to competitors. But if you’re the (well, ex-) head of Google, you’re where a lot of those software and computer science guys who need to make the requisite software breakthroughs probably are, or could be. Probably the last people who should be saying “the hardware guys need to solve this”.

It’s going to be some more profound changes to what we’re doing in software today than just tweaking the parameters on some LLM model, too. There’s probably some hard research work that has to be done. It’s not “we need immense resources dumped into manufacturing more datacenters and powerplants, and chips”. It’s translating money into having some nerdy-looking humans bang away in some office somewhere and figure out the required changes to what needs to be done in software to get us there. Once that happens, then okay, sure, one needs hardware to make use of that software. But in July 2025, we don’t have the software to run on that hardware, not yet.