• DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 hours ago

    “Please reconsider, sir.”

    God these people are such cucks.

    They’re so rabidly “American” but they are the biggest pushover losers on the planet letting a felon rapist shit all over them repeatedly. That’s pretty decidedly NOT American.

    I’m trying to imagine what it would be like to be such a loser and I simply can’t wrap my mind around it.

  • Banzai51@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 hours ago

    You mean the guy that publicly bragged that owning the Miss Teen USA pageant allowed him to go backstage and ogle naked underage girls is hiding the Epstein list? You don’t say.

  • kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 hours ago

    “Sick perversion” in the dark tongue of MAGA refers to “jovial non-hetero and non-cis people at a cool beach party surf off for cool people.”

    • zebidiah@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 hours ago

      He’s not in the list as a client, he’s an accomplice to the human trafficking. He wasn’t just a client he was a part of the team

  • zebidiah@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 hours ago

    For anyone still not clued in on this, trump wasn’t on the Epstein list as a client, he was on it as an partner/accomplice!

    He’s not just a member, he’s also the president

  • 60d@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    10 hours ago

    We investigated ourselves and found no wrongdoing. Move along, citizen.

  • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    This is literally the opposite of LAMF.

    LAMF means supporting someone saying they’ll do a thing, incorrectly assuming they’ll do the thing only to others and not you(r [collective]), without the someone having explicitly stated such.

    Then when the thing IS done to you (r collective]) as well, the LAMF is confirmed by them complaining that it was, or acting surprised that it was.

    If you support someone when they promise to do something, then they DON’T do it, that’s literally as far from LAMF as you can be.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      I think I get what you mean. You’re saying that lying to people saying you are going to help them, them assuming it is true, and then you not doing so doesn’t include the part that it is supposed to hurt others if I understand correctly, right?

      So this is just a standard lie of not helping people who thought their community would be safer with this pedophile ring exposed and off the streets.

      • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Yeah, LAMF is the phenomenon of ‘I voted for X to be done, but because I assumed it’d be done to others, not me’.

        As in ‘I voted for the Leopards Eating Faces party, but I didn’t expect them to eat MY face!’

        A politician not doing what they promised to do is not LAMF.

        But, for example, voting for someone because they said they’ll cut funding from wasteful government programs, and then complaining when funding is cut from a wasteful program that you were utilizing, is textbook LAMF.

  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    I was reading the first sentence (without realizing this LAMF) and thinking I could put a comment saying “Plot twist she actually voted for Trump”. Yea not needed.

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Good fucking gods. Leopards will go extinct by the end of this year because they’ll all have died from over eating!

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I know it flies in the face of this subs reason to exist but these people will still vote for him.

      Despite their whinging when an election comes around they will be reminded about what ever wedge issue got them out last time and go vote Republican.

      These people are entirely capable of being shocked Pikachu and voting for that at the same time.

      • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Back in 2016 I got my sister to take one of those tests where you answer a bunch of questions and it shows how well various politicians agree with you.

        She matched with Hillary Clinton like, 83%. Nearest Republican was 56% or something.

        She outright said, “Well, she’s pro-abortion so I can’t vote for her.”

    • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Only if she continued that sentence a bit more

      “everything you are doing: protect the interests of the billionaires many of which are in the list… Oh yeah…”

      Not that voting for democrats would change anything lol