Somebody’s starting to get the point of right to bear arms.
Remember when it was a common opinion in the left part of the Web that you should defend your rights legally, whatever that would mean if defending rights is usually done against the law trampling them.
Every American needs to be armed and we need to make it extremely clear to the federal government that we’re ready and willing to use the 2nd amendment as it was originally intended.
Oh sure. Give the ICE agents a reason to “fear for their lives” so they can justify shooting civilian protesters. It’s not there was a bill passed recently the gave ICE unprecedented power to do as they please.
Once you surrender that particular high ground, there’s no going back. It either revolution of capitulation. So here’s the question. Are you ready to arm yourself and face the United States military once Trump decides to use protester violence to declare Martial Law?
Plenty of possibilities. Standoff, not happened, bloodbath…. I’m leaning towards “not happened”. These Stasi have proven time and again that they like to go for easy targets that are low risk. Kids in school, women, old people…
A group of armed people surrounding police and trying to free a prisoner is a bloodbath waiting to happen. If you threaten police with guns, they can and will use guns as self defense.
Look how they handle school shooters. 300+ cops responded to Uvalde, TX, and they just sat around with their thumbs up their asses for hours. Similar in Newtown, CT. Similar in Parkland, FL. Similar in Columbine, CO.
When there is no real threat, police make a big show of using force. When there is an actual possibility of danger, they find any reason they can to fuck right off. Look at any of the Open Carry protests/demonstrations that have been held throughout the US, or even Cliven Bundy’s standoff against the Bureau of Land Management.
The government is terrified of another Ruby Ridge or Waco. A peaceful exercise of the First Amendment right to assembly, with simultaneous peaceful exercise of the 2nd Amendment is much more effective than either alone.
If we look at American history, and how the police is dealing with the situations like that, it would’ve been a mass murder, which would’ve been later justified by the police as necessary action.
Black Panters weren’t killed at once in a mass shooting, because they were killed separately in many smaller shootouts throughout, and ultimately the party was destroyed by a massive FBI operation.
Or did you thought they were successful?
So what you’re saying is is that they should always have been armed and in groups?
Black Panthers and the civil rights movement won, in large part because of the threat that the cities would end up getting burned to the ground. The emphasis that school classrooms place on MLK jr’s peaceful movement is an attempt to discredit violence is the inevitable outcome when peaceful options are denied.
They were always armed and in groups. Sometimes they were getting into shootouts with the police (1970th police, mind you, the one without tanks), which ultimately led to them dying or running away. That’s why FBI was so afraid, they pulled an enormous operation to sabotage them from the inside. They succeeded, so they didn’t have to raid them guns blazing, the tactics they never shy about.
Did civil rights movement won? Yeah, more or less. Did Black Panters won? No, they were all killed, arrested, disbanded. It’s hard to tell whether they helped achieving the legislative victory of the civil rights movement, or hindered it.
Muricans are too scared to talk about forming a Union… the notion they would actually risk life and limb to kill ICE officers is straight out of hollywood propaganda
Wonder how this would’ve gone down if all the protesters were also armed. All. Of. Them.
Somebody’s starting to get the point of right to bear arms.
Remember when it was a common opinion in the left part of the Web that you should defend your rights legally, whatever that would mean if defending rights is usually done against the law trampling them.
This is where we need to be.
Every American needs to be armed and we need to make it extremely clear to the federal government that we’re ready and willing to use the 2nd amendment as it was originally intended.
Oh sure. Give the ICE agents a reason to “fear for their lives” so they can justify shooting civilian protesters. It’s not there was a bill passed recently the gave ICE unprecedented power to do as they please.
Once you surrender that particular high ground, there’s no going back. It either revolution of capitulation. So here’s the question. Are you ready to arm yourself and face the United States military once Trump decides to use protester violence to declare Martial Law?
Plenty of possibilities. Standoff, not happened, bloodbath…. I’m leaning towards “not happened”. These Stasi have proven time and again that they like to go for easy targets that are low risk. Kids in school, women, old people…
and blue areas, if they hit red areas where the illegal immigration is actually going, the gop and magats would be raising hell.
A group of armed people surrounding police and trying to free a prisoner is a bloodbath waiting to happen. If you threaten police with guns, they can and will use guns as self defense.
That’s what the police want you to think.
Look how they handle school shooters. 300+ cops responded to Uvalde, TX, and they just sat around with their thumbs up their asses for hours. Similar in Newtown, CT. Similar in Parkland, FL. Similar in Columbine, CO.
When there is no real threat, police make a big show of using force. When there is an actual possibility of danger, they find any reason they can to fuck right off. Look at any of the Open Carry protests/demonstrations that have been held throughout the US, or even Cliven Bundy’s standoff against the Bureau of Land Management.
The government is terrified of another Ruby Ridge or Waco. A peaceful exercise of the First Amendment right to assembly, with simultaneous peaceful exercise of the 2nd Amendment is much more effective than either alone.
I think you might be right. They value and will prioritize their own lives. Dying to arrest one guy is asking a lot.
And how many times do police just say the person they gunned down was armed, but later shown that the person wasn’t armed?
They prefer to kill in armed people… It is less risky
Explain Uvalde. Explain Kent State. Explain the Black Panther Party’s protest on May 2, 1967.
Cops only escalate violence when they feel safe.
Typo Misisng UN
Ah
Not if they’re outnumbered. These men are fundamentally cowards. That’s why they’re doing this in states with gun control laws.
If we look at American history, and how the police is dealing with the situations like that, it would’ve been a mass murder, which would’ve been later justified by the police as necessary action.
That’s not what happened when the Black Panthers armed themselves. Police only like shooting at people who can’t shoot back. And acorns.
Black Panters weren’t killed at once in a mass shooting, because they were killed separately in many smaller shootouts throughout, and ultimately the party was destroyed by a massive FBI operation.
Or did you thought they were successful?
So what you’re saying is is that they should always have been armed and in groups?
Black Panthers and the civil rights movement won, in large part because of the threat that the cities would end up getting burned to the ground. The emphasis that school classrooms place on MLK jr’s peaceful movement is an attempt to discredit violence is the inevitable outcome when peaceful options are denied.
They were always armed and in groups. Sometimes they were getting into shootouts with the police (1970th police, mind you, the one without tanks), which ultimately led to them dying or running away. That’s why FBI was so afraid, they pulled an enormous operation to sabotage them from the inside. They succeeded, so they didn’t have to raid them guns blazing, the tactics they never shy about.
Did civil rights movement won? Yeah, more or less. Did Black Panters won? No, they were all killed, arrested, disbanded. It’s hard to tell whether they helped achieving the legislative victory of the civil rights movement, or hindered it.
Muricans are too scared to talk about forming a Union… the notion they would actually risk life and limb to kill ICE officers is straight out of hollywood propaganda