• Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Ah, my bad, you’re right, for being consistently correct, I should have done 0.3^10=0.0000059049

            so the chances of it being right ten times in a row are less than one thousandth of a percent.

            No wonder I couldn’t get it to summarise my list of data right and it was always lying by the 7th row.

            • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              That looks better. Even with a fair coin, 10 heads in a row is almost impossible.

              And if you are feeding the output back into a new instance of a model then the quality is highly likely to degrade.

          • jwmgregory@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            don’t you dare understand the explicitly obvious reasons this technology can be useful and the essential differences between P and NP problems. why won’t you be angry >:(