• Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Ah, my bad, you’re right, for being consistently correct, I should have done 0.3^10=0.0000059049

      so the chances of it being right ten times in a row are less than one thousandth of a percent.

      No wonder I couldn’t get it to summarise my list of data right and it was always lying by the 7th row.

      • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        That looks better. Even with a fair coin, 10 heads in a row is almost impossible.

        And if you are feeding the output back into a new instance of a model then the quality is highly likely to degrade.

    • jwmgregory@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      don’t you dare understand the explicitly obvious reasons this technology can be useful and the essential differences between P and NP problems. why won’t you be angry >:(