Support Arturo Gamboa An Antiracist accused of murder
(photo of Arturo in a leather jacket smiling outside)
Write to him at
Arturo Gamboa 457904
c/o Salt Lake County Metro Jail
3415 S. 900 W. Salt Lake City, UT 84119

Arturo was providing community defense as he has been known to do for years.
(still from a video with a red arrow pointing at Gamboa walking with a gun pointed at the ground and a yellow arrow pointing at "designated peacekeeper" pointing a gun at Gamboa, from a couple feet away)
While walking with his gun pointing at the ground a 50501 marshall drew on him and opened fire, killing one bystander and injuring Arturo, yet Arturo is the one facing murder charges

 The armed, yellow-vested "peacekeepers" at the Utah 50501 protest in Salt Lake City opened fire into a crowd, hitting two people:
A Sāmoan fashion designer with two young kids, who died.
A second-generation Venezuelan immigrant and antiracist protester who was legally carrying. Cops charged HIM.
(photos of both the fashion designer (Afa Ah Loo) and Arturo below)

The yellow-vested "peacekeepers" at the Utah 50501 event also approached several protesters and asked them to remove their masks and keffiyehs because they looked "too aggressive"
(image below of another post that says: Had one of those yellow vest people come up to me yesterday and ask me and my friends to take our masks off becasue it was suspicious. When we said we felt safter and would stay masked she then asked me to swap my keffiyeh for a normal mask because it was "too aggressive". I didn't obviously but wtf)

This morning, the national 50501 account posted a statement on Bluesky praising the actions of their "volunteer member of the protest safety team", calling the shooting victim a "depraved and disturbed domestic terrorist."
They have since deleted their post and have not issued a followup statement
(4 images from said account with proof. the visible portions of the images say: "any form of violence or advocacy of it. Our hearts go out to the protestors, attendees, residents of SLC, Pacifica community, and most importantly the victim's family as they mourn the loss of a beautiful life." "We're still gathering facts and are in contact with organizers on the ground. From our understanding, this was caused by a depraved and disturbed domestic terrorist who brandished an AR-15 and went into a crowd of peaceful protestors with an agenda to commit what we can only" "stop him, firing 3 rounds, striking the man and prventing a potential mass casualty event. In the process, he also hit an innocent bystander, Arthur Folasa Ah Loo, better known as Afa, before rushing over to give him first aid. Afa later died from his injuries, and the man with the AR-" "Our hearts go out the protestors, attendees, residents of SLC, Pacifica community, and most importantly the victim's family as they mourn the loss of a beautiful life.")

Utah is a permitless carry state. SLC has an open carry ordinance, and protests frequently see AR-15s being carried openly.
This environment makes threat assessment more challenging, which is why having armed "security" volunteers who lack extensive training is an incredibly reckless idea.
(link to a 2020 article from The Guardian titled "The birth of a militia: how an armed group polices Black Lives Matter protests." The link preview text showing an excerpt from that article says: "In Utah, members of a militia claim their presence deters protesters from becoming ..."

 Utah antiracist activists say that Gamboa (the young Venezuelan-American activist who was one of the two shooting victims) has been a fixture at local rallies, has open-carried his AR-15 before, and has never been  violent.
The police are charging him with homicide despite him never firing a shot.
(image of Gamboa doing a Black Power salute among a crowd of also-saluting antiracists)

KSL News Utah legal analyst Greg Skordas a defense attorney and former deputy DA says the recommended murder charge against Gamboa will be "difficult to charge never mind proescute."
He says the DA will look at the actions of the "peacekeeper," and doubts his actions will be found "reasonable.
(still from a KSL Investigates news clip of a a crowd walking by. The headline says: Murder Charge Could Be Difficult to Prove in Fatal Protest Shooting")

Two days after Salt Lake City Police released a one-sided statement suggesting an innocent man was a mass shooter while praising the actual killers, local news finally reports that police are investigating the "peacekeepers" who fired into the crowd.
The killer's name is still not published.

source

Note, I’m neither American, nor heavily in that scene. I’m merely signal boosting what I feel is important information countering lib propaganda.

  • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I’m remembering back to the story just a couple of days ago and I’m thinking about all the commenters who immediately accepted the story of the ‘peacekeeper’ guy - and the official line from the police - that Arturo was raising his weapon and heading towards the crowd, so the ‘peacekeeper’ shot “in defence of the crowd”. Many commenters repeated the line he had been, “likely about to do a mass murder - it’s very sad that a bystander died, but they just prevented a shooting spree”. Anyone saying ‘wtf why is the actual killer not arrested’ and suggesting that we only had one side of the story (the killer’s, who the cops were suspiciously immediately siding with) and that there is no proof beyond biased witness claims yet - was being downvoted.

    Remember this shit next time you take the word of the police at face value when very few facts are available.

  • TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Glad I took the advice of my brown activist friends and didn’t support 50501. They’re a sketch organization from the start.

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    There’s not much that’s more fascist than cops killing people and then prosecuting the surviving victims. Totally normal in USA.

    Zero surprise that normies eat it up. We’re indoctrinated into copaganda our while lives.

  • octopus_ink@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 day ago

    I understand the need to not give the jackboots an excuse, but WTF is this HOA nonsense at a protest?

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      They’re doing it everywhere. So they can get pictures of everyone’s face for their Palantir gestapo database

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Yeah, given the moment in the US, wearing a mask is just the prudent thing to do. The government’s own agents are doing it.

      • Zizzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I dont actually think thats the reason. I think its a, misguided, attempt to be able to say “look, its a peaceful protest!”

        • kautau@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          20 hours ago

          That’s certainly the messaging that organizations like Palantir would like you to believe

  • ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    A single blurry still doesn’t pose a convincing argument that he was or wasn’t pointing the weapon towards the crowds.

    I’ve not seen enough to conclude either way. So many contradicting things.

    If you were wanting to assist with security, when someone obviously doing security addresses you then you’d try and comply, and explain your intent. But did the security actually address him? Or did he just run away from a gun pointed at him? Or did he have his gun pointed in the direction of the crowd while moving towards the crowd and ignoring security? Much of this doesn’t make sense.

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      A single blurry still doesn’t pose a convincing argument that he was or wasn’t pointing the weapon towards the crowds.

      We don’t go around making plausible reasons and then asking the victim to prove them wrong. Maybe the killers are lying to cover their ass?

      Facts on the ground is: Arturo didn’t shoot anyone, had a right to carry, a bystander was killed by the “good guys” and Arturo was shot himself. Nothing in all of this proves that Arturo was a danger to anyone.

      • ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        1 day ago

        Just because he didn’t shoot anyone, doesn’t mean his alleged actions wouldn’t cause the same reaction or worse from any other reasonable person.

        Again, things aren’t lining up with the two sides/stories.

        • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          1 day ago

          Ye which is why I’m inclined to believe the non-killer’s story rather than the ones with the most incentive to lie

            • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              18
              ·
              edit-2
              24 hours ago

              Unless more evidence appears, I’m more inclined to believe the person who didn’t shoot anyone, even when they had plenty of opportunity to do so (in self defense no less) and have a history of protecting others.

              • Eldritch@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                15 hours ago

                Yep this really just seems like a tragedy from someone being overzealous. In the end only hurting allies. There’s no good outcome from this. But arguably the worst I think is to demonize an ally in an attempt to deflect blame. By shooting “preemptively” they’re where there blame lays unfortunately.

                I don’t necessarily think that there should be imprisonment or jail in this for anyone. It was all completely unintentional. And doesn’t serve any public good. But I think unfortunately a lot of people are going to want someone to crucify or demonize.

              • ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                24 hours ago

                And I’m not telling you not to. I’m just saying I’m unconvinced, and without more factual information I can’t make a decision either way.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Security was across the street and started shooting before he ever acknowledged them. They were far enough that it’s conceivable he didn’t hear them at all. He didn’t run until they fired. This is all in the link they provided. It’s a video, not a still.

      • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        I like the spirit, but IMO we need more “on the ground” details to come to an actual conclusion. Cops suck but there are lots of ways to come up with “the opposite story”.

        I’m working under “innocent until proven guilty” logic, but as of this posting I absolutely cannot make any positive conclusion about what happened other than the one second video clip posted in the comments.

    • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      23 hours ago

      You don’t have to prove you didn’t do something. The state has to prove that you did do it. We should assume he is innocent in the absence of evidence.

  • TwiddleTwaddle@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I’ve kept quiet about this online so far, but my local 50501/no kings organizers are dangerously uninformed about organizing protests and haven’t taken any of the experienced local organizer’s advice about security at these events. They’re literally primarily organized on a “liberal women’s” Facebook group. At least in my area, experienced community organizers have been staying well clear of their mess. Let them gather all the white liberals from the suburbs to go kettle themselves on a pedestrian bridge and yell at cars passing them by. They’ll learn why the experienced community defenders don’t want anything to do with them after it’s too late, but it’s not like any of us are surprised by right wingers coopting and declawing a protest movement.

  • BigFig@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Yeah send Venmo money to this random QR code! Clowns.

    Edit: reports say he was seen move away from the crowd, hid behind a low wall where he removed his rifle from his backpack, and “assumed a firing position” and moved back towards the crowd. No amount of Open Carry allows you to raise that rifle into a ready to shoot position without repercussions.

      • BigFig@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        So how do you explain away the whole showing up with your rifle hidden in a backpack, and then hiding to take it out. Open carry all you want, why the fuck would you do that in the middle of a tense protest

    • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      Yeah send Venmo money to this random QR code!

      Yeah actually, who does this actually get Venmo’ed to? The Mastodon post didn’t really clarify that IMO.

      Edit: so I haven’t tried this myself, but according to Salt Lake County Corrections, you can donate online, but I’m not 100% sure we have enough information to do so. Also I imagine you’d have to give the State your personal info. Link is below for people who trust the cops more than the QR code. (Personally, my trust for the cops is negative so I trust the random QR code more.)

      https://www.saltlakecounty.gov/sheriff/corrections/deposit/

    • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Nooooooo. It’s a leftist DO NOT BRING FACTS AND LOGIC just support them blindly and “amplify the message” from somewhere you don’t live or know jus because it aligns with your narrative.

      Kinda crazy tbh. At least it’s not Twitter I guess.

  • mkwt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    At the least, it’s reasonable to expect someone who claims to be an “armed peacekeeper” to check their background before shooting. I don’t know if that firearms sin is worth criminal charges or not, but it’s bad practice.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Unpopular opinion from someone who hasn’t daily-carried a fully-automatic rifle since leaving the job that required it: if you have a gun, expect to be shot (at). I’m sorry about people being injured and a person’s name being sullied in the process, but I stand by my comment. Untrained randos don’t need to stomp around porting ARs. That’s it; unleash the downvotes.

    • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      if you have a gun, expect to be shot (at)

      Yeah so the Black Panthers deserved to be shot at because they open-carried to demonstrate their power? Bad take. Needs more information.

      • Kobibi@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Expect =/= deserve

        The black panthers open carried in part to expose the hypocrisy of a system that was already indiscriminantly violent towards black people

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yeah so the Black Panthers deserved to be shot at because they open-carried to demonstrate their power?

        Yep.

        Bad take.

        Only if guns are your culture. For the rest of us, there is no safety in a war zone, cosplay or not.

        • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Only if guns are your culture.

          Yes guns literally are the culture in that part of the country. That’s my point. No it shouldn’t be that way, but it is. So right now, it’s absolutely not socially or legally abnormal in that part of the country to be open-carrying guns in public. And it doesn’t mean that the area is a warzone.

          Yeah so the Black Panthers deserved to be shot at because they open-carried to demonstrate their power?

          Yep.

          Well I’m glad to know you won’t stand with people who defend themselves against their oppressors. Not sure why you’re in this anarchist community if you’re not even willing to support people who stand against their own oppression but whatever 💩💩💩

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Surprisingly, I agree with you. I think jackbooting around with an AR, lefty or not, is generally stupid.

    • masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I actually agree with you - I believe that you only pick up a gun when you have a pretty good idea what (or who) you’ll be shooting at very soon.

      But then again I did grow up in a fascist state - so that might have something to do with it.