Well I am shocked, SHOCKED I say! Well, not that shocked.

  • Bosht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    53 minutes ago

    First: Nobody gives a shit about the ray tracing craze, like not really. It applies to a thin margin of games, and is an option easily turned off or avoided. Seeing as AAA games are most of the ones developing for it anyway, and seeing as most of those are utter shit, yeah I’m not buying into the craze and spending obnoxious amounts of money on it.

  • pr0sp3kt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Bah, AAA games aren’t interesting for me anymore. I like more indies nowadays, specially I am a fan of Doom-like games, I liked Selaco, Turbo-Overkill, I liked ghostrunner as well…

  • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I don’t buy every generation and skip 1 if not 2. I have a 40xx series and will probably wait until the 70xx (I’m assumimg series naming here) before upgrading.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Nvidia doesn’t really care about the high-end gamer demographic nearly as much as they used to, because it’s no longer their bread and butter. Nvidia’s cash cow at this point is supplying hardware for ML data centers. It’s an order of magnitude more lucrative than serving consumer + enthusiast market.

    So my next card is probably gonna be an RX 9070XT.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      even the RX9070 is running around $900 USD, I cannot fathom affording even state-of-the-art gaming from years ago at this point. I am still using a GTX1660 and playing games from years ago I never got around to and having a grand time. Most adults I know are in the same boat and either not even considering upgrading their PC or they’re playing their kid’s console games.

      Every year we say “Gonna look into upgrading” but every year prices go up and wages stay the same (or disappear entirely as private-equity ravages the business world, digesting every company that isn’t also a private equity predator) and the prices of just living and eating are insane, so at this rate, a lot of us might start reading again.

  • Deflated0ne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Ah capitalism…

    Endless infinite growth forever on a fragile and very much finite planet where wages are suppressed and most money is intentionally funneled into the coffers of a small handful of people who are already so wealthy that their descendants 5 generations down the line will still be some of the richest people on the planet.

  • RadioFreeArabia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    I just looked up the price and I was “Yikes!”. You can get a PS5 Pro + optional Blu-ray drive, Steam Deck OLED, Nintendo Switch 2 and still have plenty of money left to spend on games.

  • Mwa@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    I am just using my GTX 1650 4GB VRAM (GDDR6) and it works fine for most of the things i do I can use Linux + FSR Hack to squeeze framerates out of games that perform poorly
    and it runs my SCP:SL and tf2 fine
    SCP:SL am using FSR HACK To squeeze more framerate until Nvidia fixes VKD3D
    Maybe my next card is RX 6650 XT/AMD but still i might stick with my GTX 1650

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’m ngl, finances had no impact on my decisions to stay at 3080. Performance and support did. Everything I want to play runs at least 60 to 180 fps with my current loadout. I’m also afraid once Windows 10 LTSC dies I won’t be able to use a high end GPU with Linux anyways.

    • MisterCD@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      You can always side-grade to AMD. I was using a 3070 and ditched Windows for Kubuntu and while it was very usable, I would get the slightest input lag and had to make sure the compositor (desktop effects) was turned off when playing a game.

      After some research I decided to side-grade to the 6800 and it’s a night and day difference. Buttery smooth gaming. It performs better with compositor on than Nvidia did with it off. I know 6800 isn’t high end but it’s no slouch either. AMD is king on Linux.

  • nikki@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    the most i use my gpu for at this point is minecraft shaders, i dont plan on upgrading in 10+ years

  • Demognomicon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I have a 4090. I don’t see any reason to pay $4K+ for fake frames and a few % better performance. Maybe post Trump next gen and/or if prices become reasonable and cables stop melting.

    • Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I don’t think the 5090 has been 4k in months in terms of average sale price. 4k was basically March. 3k is pretty common now as a listed scalp price, and completed sales on fleabay seem to be 2600-2800 commonly now.

      The problem is that 2k was too much to begin with though. It should be cheaper, but they are selling ML cards at such a markup with true literal endless demand currently, there’s zero reason to put any focus at all on the gaming segment beyond a token offering that raises the margin for them, so business wise they are doing great I guess?

      As a 9070xt and 6800xt owner, it feels like AMD is practically done with the gpu market. It just sucks for everyone that the gpu monopoly is here, presumably to stay. Feels like backroom deals creating a noncompetitive landscape must be prevalent, plus a total stranglehold with artificial monopoly of code compatibility from nvidia’s side make hardware irrelevant.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        One issue is everyone is supply constrained by TSMC. Even Arc Battlemage is OOS at MSRP.

        I bet Intel is kicking themselves for using TSMC. It kinda made sense when they decided years ago, but holy heck, they’d be swimming in market share if they used their own fabs instead (and kept the bigger die).

        I feel like another is… marketing?

        Like, many buyers just impulse buy, or go with what some shill recommended in a feed. Doesn’t matter how competitive anything is anymore.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Technically Intel is also releasing some cheapo GPUs in similar capability to nVidia but they all have the same manufacturers anyways.

        • Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          There’s major issues with those GPUs in some commonplace use cases and they have major scalping issues. Sure in some use cases there’s zero issues, but this aint like the early 2000s when there were many brands that all basically worked.

          Now you’re either nvidia with every feature, amd with most features (kinda like a store brand), or intel with major compatibility flaws with specific games because it’s technically a GPU.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            I think patent laws and proprietary software supported by major OS have always had some impact, even the 90s, but yeah it’s definitely a poor state for the market to be this concentrated.

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      fake frames

      And that’s my main problem with what the industry has become. Nvidia always had sizable jumps generation to generation, in raw performance. They STILL get better raw performance, but now it’s nowhere near impressive enough and they have to add their fake frame technologies into their graphs. Don’t get me wrong, they always had questionable marketing tactics, but now it’s getting even worse.

      No idea when I’m replacing my 3060ti, but it won’t be nVidia.