Several service members told advocacy groups they felt like pawns in a political game and assignment was unnecessary

California national guards troops and marines deployed to Los Angeles to help restore order after days of protest against the Trump administration have told friends and family members they are deeply unhappy about the assignment and worry their only meaningful role will be as pawns in a political battle they do not want to join.

Three different advocacy organisations representing military families said they had heard from dozens of affected service members who expressed discomfort about being drawn into a domestic policing operation outside their normal field of operations. The groups said they have heard no countervailing opinions.

“The sentiment across the board right now is that deploying military force against our own communities isn’t the kind of national security we signed up for,” said Sarah Streyder of the Secure Families Initiative, which represents the interests of military spouses, children and veterans.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Right?

    This isn’t complicated. You either choose to obey an illegal order and threaten/attack other American citizens, or you don’t.

    Clearly they have generally chosen, so far, to break the law and betray their fellow Americans.

    • SaltSong@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      This isn’t complicated. You either choose to obey an illegal order and threaten/attack other American citizens, or you don’t.

      Would you be willing to risk ten years in prison that a military judge will agree that an order to go stand somewhere is illegal?

      • Krono@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Or to put it another way, do you expect our enlisted men and women to uphold the high moral virtues of honor, self sacrifice, and protection of innocents?

        After seeing what horrors American soldiers are capable of, I’m not holding my breath.

        • SaltSong@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Again, it’s one thing to expect them to reject orders they know are illegal, such as firing on civilians. It’s another thing entirely to expect them to reject orders the legality of which may be a supreme court case next week.

          • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yeah, nobody here knows what they are talking about. “I won’t go, I refuse to go.” Cool, here come the MPs, you go straight to jail. This shit happened quick. It wasn’t like these units had time to talk and maybe try to form a unified front. They got mobilized quick, and so any choice you make, you’re doing it on your own.

            And so is it right to disobey? Maybe. Is it easy? Absolutely not, and to suggest that is foolish, but easy to do from behind a desk.

            And so I think they’ll do what they must. They’ll show up, they’ll stand in a line, and they’ll hope they don’t need to do any more than that. And it goes unsaid that there’s some morons who want to beat on people, but they’re the 10%. The rest of them don’t want to be there.

            • slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 days ago

              I was just following orders.

              Also even if there are 10% who just want to beat people, are the other “good guys” stopping them? One of these cowardly cunts shot a reporter point blank and the ones areund him were more like: good job than: wtf, you can’t do that. Go lick their boots and thank them for their great service.

          • Krono@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            It seems we are in agreement then, the troops are self-interested rational actors; all of the supposed virtues are propaganda.

            But I think there is a moral imperative that says “do not obey immoral orders”, and that imperative does not come with a clause that says “unless there is a pending court case”.

            • SaltSong@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              But I think there is a moral imperative that says “do not obey immoral orders”

              Is it immoral to get on a plane, and go sleep on the floor somewhere?

              • Krono@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                No, plane rides and sleepy time are not immoral in my opinion :)

                There’s probably a good argument about plane emissions and climate change tho

          • SaltSong@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            There was the whole thing in Guantanamo Bay. And the awful treatment of civilians in Afghanistan. And in Iraq. And we can’t forget the Vietnam war.

            I think the guy you’re talking to is a duck, but he’s not all wrong.

            • Gordon Calhoun@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yeah, those are good examples. I wasn’t trying to challenge him, but was genuinely curious to know if he’d personally seen shit.