• Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 days ago

    In college (25+ years ago) we were warned that we couldn’t trust Wikipedia and shouldn’t use it. And, yes, it was true back then that you had to be careful with what you found on Wikipedia, but it was still an incredible resource for finding resources.

    My 8 year old came home this year saying they were using AI, and I used it as an opportunity to teach her how to properly use an LLM, and how to be very suspicious of what it tells her.

    She will need the skills to efficiently use an LLM, but I think it’s going to be on me to teach her that because the schools aren’t prepared.

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Wikipedia didn’t start out hallucinating. Also unlike LLMs, Wikipedia isn’t being marketed as being capable of doing things it can’t do.

      It’s not that good of a comparison.

      • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 days ago

        Wikipedia started out as being extremely unreliable. So did Lycos, AltaVista, Yahoo, etc. Those things have matured over the 30+ years they’ve been around, but they didn’t start that way. The ability to research, confirm, and corroborate is an important part of life. It always has been and always will be.

      • 5too@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 days ago

        Wikipedia did start having prank edits early on (and later malicious ones).

        Didn’t Stephen Colbert talk his fans into keeping certain content on a specific Wikipedia article at some point?