Craig Fuller thought he was voting for business savvy
How big of a fucking rock does someone have to have lived under for the last decade to have still thought Drumph had “business savvy” back in November?
All the evidence that he’s a grifter and a fraud was right there, in plain view. for anyone willing to look and see.
You can lead a horse to water, but if that horse saw someone on Facebook say that the water has gayness inducing fluoride nanobots, well…
It just further proves that propaganda works and the human brain is way too good at filtering out readily available information to support its own beliefs.
If you didn’t have enough business sense to know that Trump has negative business sense, your business deserves to fail
100%. “oh no! trump is doing exactly what he said he was going to do!” Fuck each and every one of these people.
That even goes for Republicans in general. They’ll cut/privatise the government services that businesses rely on and keep crime down, and then they’re surprised that as a business you need to spend more on mail/transport/private security in order to stay in business. Also, you’re selling less because all your customers are broke.
Nothing heartbreaking about this.
Any reasonable person knew what would happen.
It is rather heartwarming to see people getting exactly what they voted for.
Concepts of sympathy bro.
Somehow won’t stop them from voting Republican next time.
“I did not vote for a neutron bomb to wipe out supply chains and small businesses,” Fuller wrote in an April 20 social media post.
That is one hundred percent what you voted for. You knew that he was going to be completely erratic with his decision-making.
You should be hiding from your shareholders.
As in personal security hiding.
This is the second face eating article I’ve seen from sarkariform, and it’s starting to make me suspicious.
Just read up on them. Supposedly, according to mbfc, they lean far left, have no credentials, and didn’t seem to provide any sources:
TheSarkariForm.com exhibits a Left bias, particularly in its coverage of President Donald Trump and his administration. The site frequently publishes articles that portray Trump negatively, often without providing sources or evidence to support the claims.
A casual search has the first articles on 1/11/25, so either they are new or they have been purging old history. Add to this that they didn’t have any archive.org results from before 1/25/25, that’s another suggestion that they just started.
I’ll take it with a grain of salt,
Oopsies
