Banned is maybe too far, but why should we as a country allow people to have petty power over meaningless things their neighbors do? Could we ban HOAs from being included in house sales, and every time it’s sold the new owners have to opt in?

For the most part, I’m wondering about this in the context of single family homes since for homes like condos, you could make the case that HOAs are useful for shared things like roofs and whatnot. Maybe limit mandatory HOA involvement to things like what’s truly necessary and shared and not how tall your grass is?

  • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    An HOA can have a very positive effect on a neighborhood when handled properly, but inevitably a troublemaker gets on the board and starts making life miserable for everyone.

    There was a recent local case where an elderly lady in her 80s accidentally underpaid her HOA dues by 30 cents. They started fining her, and before she figured out there was an issue, the fines were thousands of dollars, and she couldn’t afford it. She tried to work it out with the HOA board, but they were immovable. Then they started foreclosure proceedings, and that’s when she went to the local news.

    This lady’s house was paid off, and they had every intention of taking it away from her in her old age, over THIRTY CENTS!

    The news tried to reason with the HOA, but they wouldn’t be reasonable, and the last I heard, she was going to have to pay a lawyer to fight it in court.

    No HOA should be able to take anyone’s house away for any reason. Same with back property taxes, especially if a propery is fully paid off. It invites predatory behavior, and there are always people who will gleefully exploit such situations.