• The Pantser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do the justices get protection like the president? Seems like they should have better protection since they are lifers while the president is only max 8 years.

      • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I only just learned about this when I started a new gubment job. Wild stuff.

        Now, as to what really needs to happen here, Thomas, at the very least, should face corruption and bribery charges. Maybe conspiracy to commit, too.

        • Rapidcreek@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Federal judges sometimes don’t want protection around them and it’s not like the Secret Service and the President. While the Secret Service can tell the President what must happen, the Marshals can’t mandate protection details. But, when things like that happen, they certainly do.

    • stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The idea was to ensure that the court never became political. This obviously didn’t work out, but the framers had good intentions.

        • stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There were no political parties and they literally believed that none would ever form. They created the US government based on the idea that parties would never exist. Naive, obviously.

    • Brawler Yukon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      while the president is only max 8 years.

      10, technically, but it doesn’t change your point. Just felt like doing an ackshully.

      #sorrynotsorry

      • jackpot@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        10? i thought as long as they didnt get the majority of the term they could keep going (so thereoretically infinite)

        • Brawler Yukon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Per the 22nd Amendment, someone who has held the office for more than two years of someone else’s elected term is limited to a single elected term of their own. So if you’ve done two or fewer, you are still eligible to be elected twice. Those two initial years plus your two elected terms would be ten years.

          No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.