• Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    14 days ago

    Again with the short notice. Y’all, people have jobs, people have families. Arrangements have to be made and contingencies have to be planned. Where will you stay? What if you get arrested? Who’s going to watch your kids?

    If you want good participation, especially with such high numbers, you can’t just give people two weeks notice.

    • jmantothe64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      14 days ago

      tbf, I’ve been hearing April 5th for over a month now, but it still doesn’t change the fact that without a highly coordinated movement, these protests aren’t going to get close to the desired effects

      • makyo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        13 days ago

        Yeah let’s ask creeping fascism if we can arrange a time where it works for all of us

        • Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          Why do you expect people to just leave their jobs?

          If I leave my job without notice, I get fired. Jobs are scarce where I live. If I have no job I lose my apartment. If I have no apartment, I am homeless. If I am homeless I can’t get a job. If I can’t get a job I’m dead because I can’t afford my asthma meds.

          • OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            Honestly, I’ve thought for a long time that this is one of the big reasons Republicans are against universal healthcare. If losing your job could likely end in homelessness or death it’s so much harder to protest.

            • entwine413@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 days ago

              That, and your healthcare being tied to employment means your employer can abuse you more. Which I guess boils down to the same thing.

        • Nougat@fedia.ioM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          Me either. Not everything is “for” me. There are people who it is for. More publicity means it’ll reach more poeple who it could be for. If you happen to know someone who’s going, kick them some money to help cover gas, water, food, first aid, whatever.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      That’s why there are limited numbers. The solution is simple, get rid of the restrictions that stop most people. Once enough people lose their job and have their family in danger, they’ll protest. They’ll do more than protest.

      If he cuts social security enough, he might generate the same impulse from seniors who have the time, and the ones who are able will show up quite livid. I don’t think he realizes that you can’t push people all the way and not have consequences, you do have to keep some semblance of bread and circus intact for control.

        • Perhapsjustsniffit@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          You’re kidding right? You know most of “those people” without protections you speak of are going to be targeted next. First they come for the trans and gays and the disabled and sick. No worries. That’s not me. Then they come for the poor. That’s all good that’s not me either.

          Then they come for you. Oops.

          Those workers without protections won’t have jobs soon enough. The world outside of your little American bubble is making sure of that. Question is

          Will you fight then?

        • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          How do you think those protections were won in other countries? Indeed those few that are in America? By asking nicely? By quietly waiting through six months of the demolition of rule of law and any form of backing for the little protections you do have?

          Your comment belongs on X, with the other variations on “No, it’s fine, just sit there, eventually the right date to express your dissatisfaction in a completely safe and risk-free way will come around and your children will thank you that you didnt risk your mortgage even if they express it mainly by sterilising themselves so they never have to be so beholden to a future that will never come as you were.”