I thought you were done? Can’t help yourself, eh? Now you’re asking me trolley problem shit and talking about harm reduction.
Sheesh. Totally and thoroughly cooked. You’re metaphorically short circuiting like all liberals do when pressed on Gaza.
I thought you were done? Can’t help yourself, eh? Now you’re asking me trolley problem shit and talking about harm reduction.
Sheesh. Totally and thoroughly cooked. You’re metaphorically short circuiting like all liberals do when pressed on Gaza.
I will never, for even a second, back down from liberals. Your ideology is shameful, and you know that because you’re trying to pass yourself off as a socialist.
You sponsor genocide and try to justify it in bad faith. You got called out and dismantled and all you have left is “muh civility”. And now you’ve run out of steam.
Is it Gavin?
What did you accomplish by voting? You sold your soul for a game you didn’t even win. It’s no wonder you’re so agitated by my ethics.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with refusing to sponsor genocide, and everything wrong with the opposite.
You are a confused SocDem who readily admits to intentionally voting for genocide. To not antagonize you would be a failure of ethics.
A socialist who advocates entryism into US electoral politics is confused and probably not a socialist. You haven’t even heard of Luxemburg’s essay, a staple of early reading lists. Have you consumed any socialist theory, not through an LLM? What in your head makes you a socialist in the same breath you, in your own words, vote for genocide of the Palestinian people?
Is it Gavin? Kamala? Who’s next? You’re a Westerner roleplaying as a leftist. You will never convince a leftist to sponsor a genocide like you have. It’s not happening now, or ever. The idea that you see benefit in voting for a genocidal administration means you’re so much farther right than you’ll probably ever realize. Your harm reduction theory will go down in history as complicity.
Time for a “lol”?
Are you a SocDem? Was I right?
If you think for a split second that we “share views except for voting” you truly are out of your depth.
One of us is a socialist. The other is what we can only assume is a SocDem, otherwise known as a liberal, or as you’ve just recently learned, a capitalist. We believe in completely different things. The rich part is how you think you’re on the left yet have zero understanding of where the line actually is.
Also, I know you read an LLM summary of Reform or Revolution. You’re intellectually bankrupt and politically confused. And also completely owned. Are you going to revert back to dropping “lol” soon?
Who will you vote for in 2028? Gavin? Pete? Which clown are you going to thrust in front of me and demand I vote for them? Kamala again?
LeSsEr eViL shit is still evil, genocide-boy.
Shouldn’t you be campaigning for another genocidal candidate? How do you have time to drop “lol” when we need to get out and voooooooote?!
It’s vibes all the way down.
Removed by mod
Hey, while you’ve unblocked .ml, I just want to slip something in:
You’re weak as hell.
This is false. Vivaldi is on manifest v3 and runs its own internal rat race against ads. uBlock origin is neutered under Vivaldi just like all Chromium-based browsers.
The idea that you’re satisfied on a downstream Chromium product but won’t try downstream Firefox products is confusing. Librewolf is nearly best in class and dominates Vivaldi in almost every relevant metric.
You just wrote a book on why we MUST do sham liberal electoral politics and advocated for voting for genocide. You’re a capitalist, you’re a liberal, and you’re clueless.
Take your annoying trolley problem bullshit and hilariously vapid and vaccuous essays and go fuck yourself, liberal.
Voting for genocide is exactly who you are, and no words you can muster will spill blood on my hands. Only one of us voted to condemn Palestinians: you.
You’re like a shitty little liberal LLM.
Stop writing essays and go organize for the Dems.
This entire exchange has been me watching you talk to yourself about something nobody gives a fuck about.
My original comment was well-received for a reason.
Read my original reply and do realize that it stood perfectly well on its own without captain obvious swooping in to give some grade-school tier lecture that nobody asked for.
Everything about you and your smarmy act is redundant. Can you shut the fuck up? Thanks.
Can you define the word redundant for me? You seem to have dodged the ask.
In 2028, are you going to ask me to vote for Mayor Pete? Lmao.