Could you get away with using something like Termux?

I was being charitable. It’s now becoming obvious you’re just a finnicky person with bad social skills.

I mean seriously, if I had a friend who got so uppity about some silly way I told time (that was common where I came from), I would have to seriously wonder what was wrong with them.

If I hand someone a gun, tell them who they can and cannot shoot with it, and train them on how to use it, I’m going to jail when they shoot someone.

This game of Civilization you’re playing in your head is horseshit.

I don’t like sniper drones.

You’re dealing with both impediments and social issues here. This would be difficult for anyone. I highly suggest professional help, but if it’s not available or you are unwilling, the next best thing would be to understand you’re going to need to fail a lot with intentions of getting better, and it may never happen. I’m rooting for you.

Edit: To clarify, speech therapy and general therapy are what you will benefit from.

You’re a hot mess, friend. Keep your chin up.

How was the comment you replied to whataboutism? Please, elaborate. I want to understand how you think.

This is “whataboutism” and you should not do it.

You didn’t like the way your friend… told time? And that was enough to end the friendship?

And I thought I was neurotic. How do you even have friends? I’m not even attacking you, I’m looking for advice here.

JAQing off about immigration based on religion and ethnicity is not an “I am from left” thing to do.

What billionaire? You made the claim. It seems trivial to produce a name, yeah?

This is what it looks like when a stubborn person makes a small mistake and would rather torpedo the whole argument than make a concession. It’s so common and so disappointing.

You were asked a direct and simple question.

Okay, I’ll have a go, since you’re a noob with people and how they actually learn and behave: Your advice sucks.

I love your face. Never change, commenter.

Sorry, let me be clear. I was pointing out how if one’s strategy is to let fascist breeding grounds sit unmolested, one will need a lot more compensation than hypothetical slippery slopes. As stated, the trade off is hardly worth it.

It’s the same style of rationale for why many leftists didn’t vote Harris.

Shutting down a nontheoretical fascist breeding ground VS. a theoretical slide to 1984.

Isn’t this the lesser evilism I was fed for the last year? Isn’t this the trolley problem? This should be easy for the American left to get behind.

Instead its “okay a little fascism is okay, as a treat” and its odd to me.

Literally the kind of elitist response the OP was lambasting.

While it may be a defense attorney’s job to come up with theories for why a crime may have happened that dampen the blow, it seems like it would have been difficult to circumnavigate this little tidbit:

During the trial, prosecutors said Woodward was affiliated with an anti-gay, neo-nazi group called Atomwaffen Division and linked his extremist views to the crime.

Why did I read all of this.