What if I walked into your house and just started taking whatever I wanted, would you condone any form of violence then? And if not, where do you live?

Of course. The Dems’ donors won’t allow any real opposition to fascism.

We tried that in 2016 when we elected Bernie Sanders as our Dem candidate. The DNC told us to go fuck ourselves and nominated Hillary Clinton anyway. So, no, apparently that won’t work either.

The NRA doesn’t want people exercising their rights, never have. They just want to make money off of those who will do so at whatever cost.

The NRA has never cared about supporting gun rights. All they care about is inserting themselves as the middle-man you’re required to pay before you’re allowed to exercise your second ammendment rights. They lobby exclusively for legislation that requires you to obtain training from one of their “licensed” instructors before being able to obtain a concealed carry permit. That’s all. Anyone who supports them is a clueless chud.

It’s the standard naming convention for all US police unions.

Yeah, and sometimes a hypocrite is just a lying sack of shit.

That line is heartbreaking when you learn that Joaquin Phoenix’s IRL brother died of a heroin overdose in the streets of New York while people stepped over his dying and dead body.

Good idea. Should we vote for another Dem who will do the same shit? Or for a hard R who will do even worse?

Completely agree. There are no US politicians who are willing to offer social progress or even support middle-class workers. If you’re not a campaign donor, you can’t get shit in this country.

Not that it matters who votes for who. After the 2024 election, it’s obvious the winner isn’t decided by votes anyway.

“Democrats agree with fascism and wont oppose it.”

Tell us something we don’t know.

They can, but they won’t. Everyone knows the Dems’ donors won’t allow them to put up any real resistance against fascism. Best they’ll do is a public condemnation, maybe a pinky swear to hold the next one accountable, if we’re lucky.

Citizens don’t get meaningful reform against face shooting or accountability for face shooters under D either.

The best we ever get is another public condemnation against face shooting and an empty threat to hold the next face shooter accountable, pinky swear this time.

Weird how there always seems to be bipartisan support on pro-corporate issues, huh?

Anyone else noticed they’re starting this stuff in the deep blue states with tight gun regulations and assault weapon bans?

If voting R means corporatism and fascism, and voting D still means corporatism and fascism, just on the next election cycle instead of this one, who cares if there’s any technical distinction between them?

Well, I’d really like not being fed slop. Quit serving it to me, and I’ll quit complaining.

“FBI soon to endorse extrajudicial murder committed by ICE agent in Minneapolis.”

They could. But they won’t. That would be more than just token resistance. Everybody knows the Dems are paid by corporations to only resist with words, motions, committees, and meaningless votes.

If we want accountability, we’re going to have to demand it, like after George Floyd.

Only once it becomes cheaper to appease us than resist us, will we be appeased.

Depending on where you live, being armed with four shots of bourbon in you may not be legal.

This is what I’m talking about; for some reason, even US citizens think we have no gun control laws whatsoever.