• finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Her Tax Plan was to tax the rich, if anything was watered down it was the media you were spoonfed without an ounce of skepticism.

    • NimdaQA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      The problem wasn’t her idea of taxing the rich, it was touting the endorsement of bankers in regards for her economic plans:

      “is why Goldman Sachs . . . is why Moody’s, which is why Wharton School of Business, which is why 16 Nobel laureates, have collectively determined after analyzing our plans . . . mine would strengthen the economy, his would weaken it.” - Kamala Harris

      Especially when the one’s that endorsed her economic plans can only be described as:

      a "great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money "

      Is touting the endorsement of bankers and Bush era war criminals really the most effective strategy that the democrat party can muster?

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Its a strategy, not the best, and it should be enough. Hopefully they learn from this and do better, but it should have been enough. People should have been voting in record shattering numbers for her.

        When even the Oligarchs think the GOP candidate is too dangerous to American Democracy, thats the canary.