Summary

Donald Trump is seeking “temporary presidential immunity” to delay or dismiss a civil lawsuit filed in Delaware by co-founders of Trump Media & Technology Group, who accuse him of blocking their full stake in the company.

Trump argues that defending lawsuits during his presidency would distract from his official duties, citing the burden of managing numerous pending cases.

His legal team claims state court lawsuits undermine the presidency.

This effort follows broader Supreme Court rulings expanding presidential immunity, though critics cite concerns over accountability.

  • Soup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    148
    ·
    2 days ago

    This dude basically got no punishment and yet still wants to not have to face consequences. He’s got a CVS reciept of felonies and was completely let go of any punishment from the last thing and he’s still mad?

    Exhausting, and imagine if a Democrat did this shit.

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      ·
      2 days ago

      imagine if a Democrat did this shit.

      No need. We saw the response to Obama’s tan suit, arugula, fist bump, dijon mustard, etc, etc.

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I mean take literally any of these executive orders and swap them for a democrat. We’d all still be pissed off and conservatives would be absolutely RABID.

        • Quadhammer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I heard cons saying that biden pardoning his family was an admission of guilt and while I don’t approve of the move I get it considering the language put forth and the branches of government that are backing him

          • Soup@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            He also pardoned Fauci and a bunch of other people because the republicans specifically said they were going to try to get revenge against them for things like prosecuting Jan. 6 rioters.

            It was a rare moment where the Democrats actually acknowledged that maybe the Republicans aren’t acting in good faith and maybe don’t care about “decorum”. About several decades too late but whatever, it’s what happened.

      • zuch0698o@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah… No. They took the high road for what that’s worth but they are not actively giving him more power/immunity

        • droporain@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          2 days ago

          Your definition of taking the high road sure is different than mine. All just to end up in the same gutter. Powerless except to pardon their friends and family, powerless except to make millions insider trading and shady deals.

  • jimjam5@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m no political scientist or savvy follower of politics, but isn’t there a paragraph or two in the Declaration of Independence about our right (duty even) to overthrow such dictators…?

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The Declaration of Independence is not a legal document in any way. It describes nothing about the law in the US or the rights of its citizens.

      • jimjam5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Ahh so it was like a free-spirited manifesto letter they wrote for posterity? Shame that it’s not a law or otherwise legally binding document.

        • Zron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          I mean, it was a declaration that the colonies were going independent. You don’t right laws in a what amounts to a strongly worded letter.

          The constitution is the legal document that setup the laws of the United States.

  • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 days ago

    So; when do you states plan on your next civil war?

    We’ll come help you burn the white house down again. :) 🇨🇦

  • Jarix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    That state of affairs – President Jefferson’s nightmare – dishonors the the Presidency and debases the state courts that purport to control his actions,"

    That ship fucking sailed under George w bush, that shit was set on fire with the first 4 years of trump

    There is no honor to be found in this presidency anymore, not for the next 8 years

      • WideEyedStupid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Yes there is. Or there can be. A monarchy doesn’t automatically mean the King/Queen actually has power.

        The Netherlands, for example, is a monarchy, but is a parliamentary representative democracy. I think monarchies are ridiculous, we should just get rid of it. But you definitely can’t call Willem-Alexander a dictator.

        • Indeed. European monarchies are like this. The monarch has no real power, they can only sign the laws passed by the parliament. It’s basically like a president of the republic in countries like Italy. Except you can’t vote to choose a new one.

          Turd’s model of monarchy is akin to those absolutists we remember before France invented their well known and completely democratic way of unelecting a king.

          • futatorius@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            The English parliament unelected a king by similarly sharp means over a century before that, though they left the aristocrats alone.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Looks like someone needs to take up the mantle of the world’s sexiest man alive, User4616250, after he gets out of office either by force or otherwise.

  • Tilgare@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    citing the burdon of managing numerous pending cases.

    It’s so easy to not have numerous pending cases against you in the first place. I want nothing more than for this dipshit to be stuck in court defending every one of his illegal actions taken the last 55 years. Couldn’t happen to a better person.

  • leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    lawsuits during his presidency would distract from his official duties

    that is covfefe, golfing and making ai slop executive orders?