• pixelscript@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Is this another one of those “by law, the addition has to look visibly distinct from the historical structure” renovations?

    Same thing that allegedly happened to this one?

  • tiramichu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Before building work started I guarantee they promised "A tasteful renovation in keeping with the structure’s historical aesthetic"🙄

  • Filibuster_Rhymes@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    This could have been a really cool reno with a better roof line and some vertical siding that tied in the butresses. Instead, it just looks cheap.

  • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Better than just demolishing the church, I guess, but they could have invested a little more into the materials and design and made it blend with the original facade better. Don’t just build a square vinyl box.

    • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      there are many churches in Europe who were amputated or completely destroyed by American aerial bombings. Some were hastily rebuilt with cement and these hasty renovations after the WW2 have no architectural or historical value 🤷

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I’m guessing this picture isn’t of Europe. There’s a stroad, as well as minivans and SUVs. I would guess this is North America. Probably the US, but that’s just because I believe our neighbors to the north have a bit more class than this monstrosity indicates.

        #FuckCars

  • exothermic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’ve heard that leaving one wall up like this classifies a construction project as a renovation. I’m guessing this was done because it was cheaper or it’s in a historic district? Idk

    • CoCo_Goldstein@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’ve heard the same. If a property is ‘renovated’, it retains the same value, tax wise, no matter how much larger the renovated building is.

      Not sure how this plays out with a formerly tax exempt property like a church once it get converted into a non-tax exempt property such as a residential apartment building.