• bobman@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      2 years ago

      Lol. The luddites fought to end industrialization because they didn’t want technology to take their jobs. That’s not a better future for anyone except lazy people who don’t want to adapt.

      Sound familiar?

        • bobman@unilem.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          What are you talking about?

          Or are you just upset I’m criticizing something you like?

          • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            You’re just saying the word luddites like that’s a cogent critique of anything. You clearly know nothing beyond the headline generalities here.

            • bobman@unilem.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              2 years ago

              What are you talking about?

              My point, very simply put, is that you’re okay with blue collar jobs being automated but not white collar ones.

              Please elaborate on why I “clearly know nothing beyond the headline generalities here.” What a vapid, nothing-statement. Lol.

                • bobman@unilem.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  Right. You don’t have to explicitly say it for it to be true.

                  If you’re against AI taking white collar jobs, but not blue collar ones, then “you’re okay with blue collar jobs being automated but not white collar ones.”

                  Lol. Not sure why this needs to be spelled out for you so many times.

                  Probably because you don’t like what’s being said and need to remain cognitively dissonant.

                  • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    You’re inferring positions I haven’t taken, and then insisting I have taken them when I clarify that is not my position.

                    Notably ironic that the term “cognitive dissonance” occurs to you in this context.