fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agostars & sharksmander.xyzimagemessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up1869arrow-down18
arrow-up1861arrow-down1imagestars & sharksmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square56fedilink
minus-squarefalsemirror@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up42arrow-down1·1 year agoUnfortunately (or fortunately?) this appears to be untrue. Polaris is a cluster of stars formed about 2 billion years ago. Sharks originated about 450 million years ago. One star of Polaris (Aa) appears to be 50 million years old, but it seems likely due to a collision of stars which added mass to it.
minus-squareNicht BurningTurtle@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·1 year agoSo it’s technically not wrong.
minus-squareWren the Malamute@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 year agoAnd yet, technically wrong
minus-squareNicht BurningTurtle@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·1 year agoSchrödinger’s fact.
minus-squaremexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·1 year agoBut polaris Aa is the only visible star with naked eye. So that can be called formation of star?
Unfortunately (or fortunately?) this appears to be untrue.
Polaris is a cluster of stars formed about 2 billion years ago. Sharks originated about 450 million years ago.
One star of Polaris (Aa) appears to be 50 million years old, but it seems likely due to a collision of stars which added mass to it.
So it’s technically not wrong.
And yet, technically wrong
Schrödinger’s fact.
But polaris Aa is the only visible star with naked eye. So that can be called formation of star?