“These attacks violate the human right to life, absent any indication that the victims posed an imminent lethal threat to anyone else at the time.”
“These attacks violate the human right to life, absent any indication that the victims posed an imminent lethal threat to anyone else at the time.”
You’re implying it’s ok for them to act worse.
It’s not a country they are at war with nor a country that is at war with literally anyone. Israel carried out a heinous attack on their civilian population without warning and with booby trapped civilian items in contravention on international law.
Israel can’t claim the high ground while violating sovereignity committing terrorist acts. Why are you so sure Israel acting like terrorists is somehow excusable.
Were these targeted attacks against hezbollah militants (who are sworn enemies of Israel and are responsible for terrorist attacks inside Israel) or were they against random civilians living in Lebanon? How do you define terrorism?
More importantly how do you define terrorism.
I will go with “random attacks on civilians intended to instill fear in a populace”. Now you go
Then neither Hamas nor Hezbollah are terrorists by your definition.
Are you the same guy who sent me a link and called me an idiot for not reading it even though it supported my point?
Couldn’t tell you but you could certainly just look instead of trying in vein to misdirect.
It’s just that I have no idea what you are talking about, you have been wrong several times, and refuse to clarify what you mean about anything. Basically this is a dead end conversation.
Oop there you go again, it’s not terrorism by your definition so you abandon your definition. Neat.