• A_A@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      2 months ago

      TF1 (… standing for Télévision Française 1) is a French commercial television network … TF1’s average market share of 24% makes it the most popular (french) domestic network.

      • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah but how am I supposed to know what my knee jerk reaction to this story should be if someone doesn’t tell me whether it’s a left or right publication?

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I can really see how this bot helps the moderation team and somehow lowers their volume of work as they’ve claimed multiple times for keeping it around despite everyone hating it for some reason or another.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Everyone hates it because it’s bad data.

        Edit: no, strike that, it’s not even data, it’s just one guy’s opinion.

      • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        What happens when the bias checker is biased?

        The mbfc site should not be used for anything. It’s just the subjective opinions of the site owner (who is misleadingly talking about “we” and “our” in his methodology page), aided by a few unknown volunteers who do some of the “checking”. The site claims to be objective, but there’s been enough examples to show that it isn’t (fe, it says that Fox News is as trustworthy as The Guardian or that CNN is somehow center left).

        The so called methodology that is used, is just a lot of words that boil down to “several facets were checked by a human and that human gave a subjective rating to each facet, we then count up those subjective ratings and claim to be objective because we use a point system”.

        For checking the trustworthiness of a source, I’d say that the mbfc site is about as useful as using CPU Userbenchmark for chosing a CPU. Yes, it’s easy to read and more convenient to use than other sources, but it’s also a load of horseshit and unless you drill down into the underlying “data”, you’re just going to draw the wrong conclusions because of how misleading the site is.

    • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Who the hell writes a bot to fail loudly like this? If you can’t identify the source, shut the fuck up.