• khornechips@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Honestly, that sounds like both sides foolishness with extra steps. How can you be politically engaged and still think there’s a middle ground between “kill all minorities” and “don’t do that”?

    • pingveno@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      That’s an obvious strawman argument. How about a spectrum between high taxes, generous social safety net and low taxes, skimpy social safety net? There are people with beliefs all along that spectrum. Of course, then there are people who want low taxes and a generous social safety net, but that’s another matter.

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean that literally describes “socially liberal fiscally conservative” morons. No tax! Only benefit!

        • pingveno@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s the opposite of (genuine) fiscally conservatism, since it implies large fiscal deficits. Not that some fiscal deficits are inherently bad, they are widely misunderstood when used in a limited way.