• sunzu@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Your entire thesis here rests on a logical fallacy… How else would you end it?

      • 2484345508@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I end it when people stop the conversation by pointing out that they don’t like the argument style, instead of engaging. Clearly this topic upsets you, and I don’t wish to upset you.

        Let’s agree to disagree.

        • sunzu@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Clearly this topic upsets you, and I don’t wish to upset you.

          You are making shit up lol

          This not agree or disagree issue. You were passing a trust me bro as some sort of fact and got called on it. Just take the L with dignity, boomer

          • 2484345508@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            You just don’t like that I’m suggesting that if you were rich and powerful, you would inevitably be corrupted.

            My point was eventually to arrive at how people should not be allowed to become too rich or powerful.

            Please, my dude, accept the L with dignity.

            • sunzu@kbin.run
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              You are assuming that people become corrupted after they obtain wealth instead

              When there is another example that is just as feasible, ie they obtained wealth because they are corrupt.

              There is really no way to know which one is true either. So passing one or the other as a maxim is disingenuous.

              While I do agree with final conclusion, the premise you lead with doesn’t hold to scrutiny.