• stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is perfectly fair, I saw several anti nuclear power articles before thls, and I approached it from a more general viewpoint.

    But if the alternative is coal, I’d go nuclear.

    • CurlyWurlies4All@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Well it’s not really an either/or situation. The current Labor government’s plan is a combination of majority renewables with gas and hydrogen. They are also running coal at the moment but have no plans to renew those plants during the transition. They’ve signed on to emissions reductions of 75% by 2035.

      So you’ve got one plan which has some reduction targets (probably not steep enough) planned transition, costed and budgeted that doesn’t require more coal, and one plan which will pull funding from renewables, and requires more coal until some time as which they can get nuclear approved, built and commercialised.