If inciting an insurrection towards their own government is an action without legal repercussions, I don’t see how the law would be less lenient about straight up firing a gun at an opponent.

I by no means want any party to resolve to violent tactics. So even though I play with the thought, I really don’t want anything like it to happen. I am just curious if it’s actually the case that a sitting president has now effectively a licence to kill.

What am I missing?

  • x1gma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    So, the “license to kill” is fine, as long it’s non US citizens?

    Your definition of democracy and basic human rights is fucking unhinged.