Alt text:

An idling gas engine may be annoyingly loud, but that’s the price you pay for having WAY less torque available at a standstill.

  • blady_blah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    “On the other hand gas has a much higher energy density than batteries and a much faster refuel rate.”

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s exactly this. Convenience. We’ve become accustomed to how convenient it is and don’t want to be put out.

      On the other hand, it’s super convenient to never go to a gas station again, and to wake up to a full tank. So if you drive less than 60 miles a day, and have acess to another car for long trips, an electric is even more convenient.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s basically 90% of every car owner.

        It’s one of those things where people feel like they’re going to take a road trip every weekend, but most people are just using their car to commute to and from work and maybe take one or two longer trips per year. The time saved by not having to stop at a gas station throughout the the year is less than the additional time taken at a fast charging station for the rare road trip.

        • ssj2marx@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          It’s wild how little you end up actually needing more than 50 mi range. Even in a spread out California city, I rare use the ICE in my Volt

        • jballs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Unfortunately, people tend to buy vehicles to best accomplish 1% of their driving. I live in the suburbs and almost every house has a giant pickup parked in front. Not because people are in the construction business and need to haul a lot of stuff, but because once a year they might go to Home Depot and it feels good to put their two bags of mulch in the back.

          • zeekaran@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            If they use a camper or heavy trailer even four times per year, fine whatever keep your truck. The other millions of Americans should’ve just rented a vehicle when they needed it, and it would’ve been far cheaper and more convenient to have their daily driver as a regular sized sedan.

          • Fondots@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Part of the problem is not having the money or space for an extra vehicle.

            I drive an SUV, I don’t particularly like driving an SUV, I get a lot of use out of having a larger vehicle, I’m an avid DIYer who makes frequent trips to the hardware store to pick up lumber and such, I have a lot of outdoor hobbies and usually end up being the one who drives so I’m carrying gear for several people, I don’t exactly go off roading, but those hobbies sometimes take me on some poorly maintained, deeply rutted, muddy roads and 4wd has gotten me out of some jams, I occasionally drive onto the beach to go fishing, usually find myself towing a small trailer a couple times a year, and I’m an essential employee that lives in an area that gets snow with a weird schedule that usually has me commuting before the snow plows have gotten through everywhere.

            But even though I probably get more actual use out of an SUV than most people, most often I’m still only driving about 20 miles or less a day, on paved roads, in weather that doesn’t require anything more than working headlights, wipers, and tires that aren’t totally bald.

            If I had the budget and parking space I’d probably have the cheapest base model EV I could find for most of my commuting and small errands and save the SUV for my days off and when it snows. That’s not the case though.

      • mortalic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Or just use the clothes dryer circuit… Charge the car overnight… Get all the range.

        • LordKitsuna@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          You don’t even need the clothes dryer circuit, the vast majority of people don’t drive enough in a day to need anything more than a standard 15a outlet

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        it’s super convenient to never go to a gas station again, and to wake up to a full tank

        But, to make that possible, you basically have to have a “gas station” at home. If you own your own house you can modify it to install a charging spot. If you rent, you might not have that option.

        • Robert7301201@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          All EVs come with Level 1 chargers that plug in to your standard house outlet, NEMA 5-15R. If there’s an outlet nearby you can charge your car.

          That can still be difficult for apartment renters, but there’s no need to modify your house.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            All EVs come with Level 1 chargers that plug in to your standard house outlet.

            Sure, but if you use those it takes a very long time to charge. Like, from empty it can take 40+ hours to charge a battery EV from empty to 80%. If you’re using your car to commute and your commute is anywhere near the max range of your car, that isn’t a viable option.

    • zeekaran@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      If you don’t drive for work–and I mean get paid to drive hundreds of miles every day, not just a long commute–or take a road trip every month, and have a place to charge at night (most people do, at least in North America), then an EV is just better.

      Otherwise, a plug-in hybrid or a “gasoline boosted EV” like a Volt is sufficient. ICE cars for regular people shouldn’t have even existed once the Volt proof of concept was proven!

    • Dave@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Are those two things actually important?

      Electric motors are a lot more efficient, and battery technology is quickly approaching the place where you can get the same range with an electric motor as with an ICE.

      As for refuel rate, I spend no time waiting for my car to charge because it charges at home while I’m sleeping, so the refuel rate doesn’t matter.

      Plus the technology to battery swap is well in use for electric vehicles (see Nio, who have thousands of battery swap stations in China and some in Europe too). 3 mins and you have a full battery.

      • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yes, for people who can’t charge at home. I’d love to swap to electric, but 1 hour trip to go charge the car at the nearest charging station is not realistic - especially since I’d need to do it twice as often as 10min trip to refuel.

        Also there’s the EV prices, starting at 2-3 times more than my current whip lol

        • Dave@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          My point is that we should be focused on the outcomes we want. It isn’t really important that fossil fuels are a lot more energy dense if the electric cars can travel twice as far. They can’t, but I’d be willing to bet we will get to that point with fossil fuels still being more energy dense.

          But also as I mentioned in the comment you relied to, Nio have a vast network of battery swap stations where you can get a full charge in a couple of minutes, the same as filling up at a gas station.

          The price of EVs are a problem, and not the only problem, but my point was that the specific things mentioned don’t stop us having better EVs than ICEs, because we will get the same outcome in a different way.

          • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I absolutely agree that we should work on improving EVs, charging network and whatever technologies makes it better and more suitable for more people. But every person in need of a car has unique hard requirements for the car that can’t be ignored as “inconvenience” - and many of those people have to drive with fossil fuels still.

            Also, battery swap stations being available in X location doesn’t matter to people living in Y location, nor should people in Y location buy EV in hopes that it will be better in Z years

      • Michal@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        It matters to people who drive more during the day than their range allows. They don’t want to wait 20 minutes for the car to charge every time they venture 300km out and back /s

        • Nomecks@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Why do people still pretend it takes longer than 20 minutes to get a 50% charge increase?

          • ShieldGengar@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Because it’s currently easier to find a gas station than a charger that will do that performance. Now I’m willing to wait 8 hrs for 10%, but others certainly aren’t.

            • Nomecks@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              You must live in a red state or the middle of nowhere. It’s easy to find chargers everywhere I’ve been.

              • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                My parents live in the sticks, in a red state, and I have no problem finding charging stations within twenty miles from them.

              • ShieldGengar@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                Yes, my point. I have to charge my car at home because of charging stations are either far, or Tesla owners park in them to do shopping.

                Saying I live somewhere shit doesn’t disprove my point that gas is more readily available.

                • Daxtron2@startrek.website
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Yeah because the conservative government of those areas is actively suppressing them from being built.

            • myplacedk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago
              1. I don’t have enough charge for my trip. I’m also thirsty.

              2. I go to a grocery store with a fast charger.

              3. I buy a drink.

              4. I have enough charge.

              If it’s a long trip where I need more charge, I choose a car snack, and I’ll have enough.

              If I’m on an actual long car trip and I want to charge all the way from the warning light to 100%, I will need to eat a meal anyway. I just find a McDonald’s/cafe,/restaurant/whatever with a fast charger, and it’ll be full before I’m done.

              But finding a store/eating place with a fast charger is still waaaay less convenient than just finding a place where I can get diesel in seconds, and find a different place to get drinks/food/snacks.

            • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              fast charging on modern HV battery packs will get you to 80% from 0 in like 15-20 minutes. I’ve seen lower, but it’s really fucking usable now.

            • Nomecks@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Most cars will charge to 80% pretty fast. 20%-70% is really fast on most.

        • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Why /s? Road trips are a thing, and you’d be hard pressed to find a combo restaurant/charging station that’s along your path.

          • vithigar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            restaurant/charging station combo

            The people providing the charging infrastructure here haven’t figured out this important point yet. Gas stations are a terrible place to put chargers, no one wants to stop at a gas station for fifteen minutes to an hour at a time. Charging stations need to be in places people will be stopping anyway, or at the very least places that provide something to do while waiting. Restaurants, shopping centres, tourist traps, whatever.

            Here it’s exacerbated by the fact that the fastest chargers we have only deliver about 60kW. Not even close to the 200+ some EVs need to get the fast charging times they advertise. But that 60kW would be perfectly fine if I could spend the time in a restaurant instead of standing around at a gas bar in the middle of nowhere.

            Hell, even cheap (or free) “level 2” chargers outside restaurants and shopping malls would be a huge help.

            • myplacedk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              I live in Denmark, here the chargers are placed where people park anyway. Grocery stores, parking lots, rest stops…

              It’s getting so easy to find a fast charger/resto combo, that we don’t even plan it from home.

              I’ve seen few 200+ watts chargers without looking for them, but the car is ready faster than I am anyway.

          • ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’m so glad here in Germany they do that more often now. We have a quite a few large charging parks next to restaurants and bakeries. I just made a 9 hour trip to Denmark and it was a pretty nice experience overall. Only downside is you have to plan ahead if you want this convenience because the majority is still spots with 1-2 occupied chargers at some ugly, smelly Autobahn rest area.

          • Soggy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Road trips are a tiny fraction of all vehicle use, it’s fine to relegate them to specialty vehicles.

            • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Quick Google says a great majority of Americans take road trips. Even though it’s a tiny fraction of their driving, it’s still a deciding factor for many when choosing a car. Not all people have the luxury of affording a second car just for road trips.

              Public transportation would be good, but there’s less flexibility to it. For example, just yesterday, on a return from a roadtrip, I got stomach sick and had to request frequent stops. That wouldn’t fly on a train.

              I’d love it if we had affordable and flexible public transport for getting all across the country, though.

              • nemith@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                I take road trips in my EV. It’s fine. You get to pee and walk the dog. The extra time isn’t much and it’s actually way more relaxing

                • Starbuck@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  It’s weird how defensive people get over their cannonball road trips. It’s great to take a few minutes on a break while taking a long trip.

                  • minibyte@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Hell, my ICE car warns me when I’ve been driving for too long. Taking a break mid-trip isn’t isolated to EVs

              • LordKitsuna@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Unless you’re taking road trips literally every other week you could just rent a gas vehicle when it’s time for a road trip. Rather than make the decision of the car you’re going to drive every single day based on something you only do maybe once a year.

                It’s why I don’t own a pickup truck, I actually do haul cars, help people move and all that shit that people say is why they need a pickup truck but I just go to fucking U-Haul and rent either the Sprinter van or the pickup truck for 30 bucks plus mileage when I need one. And I do actually keep track of my financial records with a double Ledger Finance app I just went and looked and I’m still nowhere near the cost of a used pickup truck from all of that renting

                • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Yeah, but road trips can be expensive. Suppose you want to go from Harrisburg PA to Rockford IL with 2 adults and 1 teenager from November 15 to 22.

                  • By car that’s about 1500 miles. An average car gets 21 mpg, so that’s about 71 gallons. Gas is around $3.5 per gallon, so the trip costs about $250 in gas. You’ll need a hotel. I picked a random one in Ohio. $110 for the way up, $185 for the way back. I guess that’s a Thanksgiving price hike. $545 total.
                  • By train, let’s say Amtrak because that came up first. $438 up, and that includes boarding a train at midnight and sleeping on the train, and then riding a bus from Chicago to Rockford for 2 hours. $483 back down, and this time when you sleep on the train you have to wake up by 5 AM to get off. Also this is coach class, and those seats aren’t great for sleeping. At least you don’t need a hotel. $921 total.
                  • By plane, it’s $650 round trip, simple as, but you have to leave at 6 AM on the way up and 5 AM on the way back. It can cost $200 more to get a more convenient time, but let’s assume you’re going for economy alone. $650 total.

                  That’s not accounting for food prices along the way. That could bring the car ride up to the same price as the plane if you don’t pack food, but if you’re spending extra on convenience there, you’re probably willing to spend extra for convenience on the plane too.

                  So it’s probably safe to say that, for this group, the car saves about $100 per year, but helping to protect the environment is worth that price. On the other hand, there’s something to be said for the flexibility and ease of planning on a car. For a bigger family, cars would be a way better option, and for a family without kids or a lone traveler, planes are the way better option. Trains are right out.

                  • Michal@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    I’d also add time to the comparison. Time isn’t free, and if you spend 2 solid days driving, you might reconsider flying and renting a car at the destination even if it’s more expensive. If you use an ev and have to take a few stops extra that might tip the scale.

        • Dave@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Although own an electric car, I believe range is still an issue. I was specifically addressing fuel density and charging time. EVs have their issues, but I believe they will be solved over time even though they are unlikely to beat an ICE in fuel density or charge rate for a long time. But I don’t think those things are actually important, because the problem is solved in a different way.

      • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Are those two things actually important?

        yes, they are. they make difference between actually usable technology and engineer’s dream.

        Electric motors are a lot more efficient, and battery technology is quickly approaching the place where you can get the same range with an electric motor as with an ICE.

        i doubt we even have enough rare metals for 8 or 16 billion batteries. most of them are being mined in politically unstable or to western civilization unfriendly countries, with terrible effect on the environment.

        efficiency matters, it is not a question of how good single battery is.

        As for refuel rate, I spend no time waiting for my car to charge because it charges at home while I’m sleeping, so the refuel rate doesn’t matter.

        oh good. YOU have it solved, so the rest of the world does not matter, i assume…? fuck all these people, right?

        https://i.imgur.com/krFICor.png

    • then_three_more@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      On the one hand the Nokia 3310’s battery lasts a week. On the other hand the iPhone 15…

      Just plug your car in when you’re not using it like you’d charge your phone overnight. It’s only a problem if you can’t charge at home (due to on street parking and no charging facilities on that street) and you can’t charge somewhere you usually take your car (eg a workplace).

      • gimsy@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Nope,it’s a problem in many other scenarios

        If i ride to vacation to a country with no charging infrastucture, if I want to ride to the mountains where it is subzero and my range drops dramatically, if I go to a place where it’s 38 deree celsius and I need AC my range is pretty much fucked up… (not to mention that close to remote places like cool beaches there is no charging station)

        If I want to have a road trip… i suddenly becomes a planning issue

        There are still so many things that are complicated by having a EV, and I don’t need the extra complications

        • Bronzie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Dude…

          Norway is incredibly sparsely populated and has an adoption rate of 80%+. We also have stupid cold winters, loads of fucking mountains and require AC in summer.
          I’ve driven through Europe twice with no more than 2 minutes of planning in an app.

          Your comment makes me think you have no experience with EV’s at all and are spreding false claims.

          There are literally two scenarios where an EV is not better than ICE (if purchased new today).

          One is for people frequently traveling far beyond the cars range and the other is for people without access to AC charging at all.

          And no, I’m not a EV lover/gasoline hater. I ride a motorcycle powered by dinosaur juice too. I just like having 400+ BHP and 700 Nm of torque in a car priced like a Toyota Avensis, and a full tank every single time I leave my driveway with said full tank costing me <$5.

          You should want that too unless you belong to one of the two exeption groups above.

          • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            My issue with EVs isn’t the EV itself, it’s that they’re all smart cars. Granted, most new ICE cars are being overladen with bull shit too so I think I’m just stuck with cars from the 2010s.

            • Bronzie@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              That is a perfectly reasonable argument.

              Is it because of costly repairs down the line or potentially being spied on you dislike?

              Personally I quite enjoy the newer features for safety and usage, but I get wanting stuff that is simpler to wrench on.

              • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Both tbh. I also just don’t like the usability and looks of everything being a screen. I really hate digital dashboards. The newer cars feel like they were designed to be disposable like a smart phone, where long term use isn’t a consideration.

                I have seen some services that convert ICE cars to EV, so I may just do that when my engine needs replaced

                The reason I single out the 2010s is because that’s when I could get a touch screen with car play, but still have HVAC controls as a button and no digital dashboards.

        • sour@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          So you agree that we should heavily invest in building EV charging infrastructure?

          • gimsy@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            We should slowly invest and push for transition, but the current status quo is for early adopters and enthusiasts IMO