I watched the first 30 seconds and it was just explanation about knowing nothing about the subject. (Precious steam machines and the steam controller). It didn’t seem relevant to me.

Exclusives doesn’t mean distribution rights.

Also gaming is coming faster to arm than apple is going to switch back to x86_64. (But still not that fast)

Hard to imagine but back in the day it wasn’t up to your operating system to distribute software. They were just a platform and you had open choice to obtain software.

Apple showcasing what their hardware and software was capable of was normal. I don’t think this was negligent but maybe naive seeing how things are run now. It was much better and we got better products and competition.

Budgie was an apple developer before with Marathon which was exclusive not because of any distribution rights but just preference for the platform.

Alas money talks.

Technically yes. Very much so.

I used to work at FB a a while back (working on infra, not FE or anything user touching) and we would have private development servers and occasionally I would need to do work on the FE PHP repo (called www) and would need to stay a development server for FB.

It would connect ti the various services and database as read only and was a private copy. It functioned just like a real webswver with the exception that the cache was stone cold. It would takes MINUTES to load the front page the first time. It is crazy how much caching just makes it functional.

The problem is that there are so many services and datasets read all the time.

Yeah. So just straight up a bribe.

And a real hero

canyon.mid

We have this already. It’s called dependant deduction.

In general, you are right. Once you explain to the borrow check you are doing the right thing then you have a fair level of confidence in it being right.

I think the point from the article is if it is worth it. Give the single sentence in the article about a list and pointer. There are various ways to do it safely (and ways to do it unsafely like you pointed out) and sometimes it might be ok to put the onus of that onto the developer and validated with valgrind, asans, and unit tests. For some this is far more enjoyable than worry about the borrow collector.

It’s all a trade off and it’s ok to have difference criteria when approaching a problem like a cli tool or even a business critical service. The problem becomes when Rust people claim that the borrow checker is the only way and we all roll our eyes.

Nice.

I have a theory on this. They use a lot of ML for FSD and Ap. That a radical redesign would change the model enough that they would have to retrain from scratch. So they keep the facelifts extremely minor .

Just a theory.

But can you use tangled without bluesky? It doesn’t seem like you can right now.

Brave isn’t the answer….

Rolling fedora on the other hand is interesting

Linus Sebastian . Is this you?

Reading articles is over rated. Just make a comment solely based on the title. Good move.

Nice! This is very exciting. I don’t like the current landscape of python type checkers.

Please implement something like pyre-upgrade for being able to enable strict linting and upgrade existing code bases (but without all the other problems pyre brings). https://pyre-check.org/docs/types-in-python/#upgrade

Latro? What’s latro?

Reports from one guy who says he is a lifelong republican?

Exactly. It’s more like rough 30% of eligible voters. Fact is that roughly 47% didn’t vote.