Today in our newest take on “older technology is better”: why NAT rules!

    • sep@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I assume the normal fear of unknown things. It is hard to hate ipv6 once you have equivalent competence in ipv4 and ipv6.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What is localhost now again…

      Edit, remember you could use 127.0.0.1, but then it was changed to like 127.0.0.1…something…ff

      So guess I was wrong :-) thanks for the info!

    • zewm@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      For me is because it’s so fucking slow. As soon as I disable ipv6 on every device it has better speeds.

      IPv6 is trash.

      • orangeboats@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tell that to your ISP which has fucked their IPv6 deployment up. In my experience IPv6 is actually faster since it bypasses the IPv4 CGNAT.

        On busy days my IPv4 connection can get as slow as 15KB/s, now that’s trash.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s one practical thing. Routers have had years to optimize IPv4 routing, which has to be redone for IPv6. Same with networking stacks in general.

          In theory, IPv6 should be faster by not having to do bullshit like CGNAT. There’s every reason to think it’ll match that advantage if we just make it happen.