Ireland, Spain and Norway have announced they will formally recognise a Palestinian state on 28 May, triggering an immediate response from Israel, which said it would retaliate by recalling its ambassadors from Dublin, Madrid and Oslo, and withholding vital funds from the Palestinian Authority.

The three European governments made the long-awaited announcements in coordinated moves on Wednesday morning that they said were intended to support a two-state solution and foster peace in the Middle East.

“We are going to recognise Palestine for many reasons and we can sum that up in three words: peace, justice and consistency,” Spain’s prime minister, Pedro Sánchez, told the parliament in Madrid, to applause. “We have to make sure that the two-state solution is respected and there must be mutual guarantees of security.”

MBFC
Archive

    • Knightfox@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      No one said that, dipshit.

      Dismantle verb

      To get rid of a system or organization, usually over a period of time:

      https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/dismantle

      Basically everyone wants either two-states based on 1967 borders or Israel to give Palestinians equal rights and create a single, secular democracy

      Except this guy specifically said he hopes the current Israel is dismantled. At best they could be hoping that Israel changes into a better government, but I don’t think that’s their meaning.

      • Devorlon@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        7 months ago

        dismantling the brutal apartheid regime

        No where does that say dismantling Israel.

        • Knightfox@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          7 months ago

          that has colonised Palestine for 76 years.

          So who are they talking about then?

          • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            7 months ago

            Dismantling Israel as an apartheid state and replacing it with a secular binational state that has equal rights for Palestinians and Israelis?

            • Knightfox@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Well that can’t be what he thinks, I listed that as an option in my original response

              Except this guy specifically said he hopes the current Israel is dismantled. At best they could be hoping that Israel changes into a better government, but I don’t think that’s their meaning.

              But he clearly said

              No where does that say dismantling Israel.

              So what entity which has colonized Palestine for 76 years, but isn’t the current Israel does he mean?

              EDIT: Words have meaning, if the words you use don’t mean what you mean, then admit that you used the wrong words and be more clear or else people must assume you mean what you say. Coming in after the OP and attributing meaning that they didn’t give doesn’t suddenly change what they said. A reminder, the original post was;

              Hopefully this is a step toward dismantling the brutal apartheid regime that has colonised Palestine for 76 years."

              • EurekaStockade@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                7 months ago

                Dismantling the regime. If someone said we need to eliminate the Chinese Communist regime, would you think they want to destroy the entirety of China?

                • Knightfox@lemmy.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  I know I said we need to be clear in our language, but since we were talking about a “regime” from the beginning I didn’t think I had to continuously spell it out throughout the discussion. Yes, we’re talking about whatever regime is being referenced, but again the last guy said it wasn’t Israel.

                  Regime Noun

                  a particular government or a system or method of government:

                  Your comparison between China and Israel is really terrible. If we’re being super duper clear on what a regime is, it’s the system of government. Israel is a parliamentary democracy, all citizens over the age of 18 can vote. Since the regime is democratically elected it’s kinda hard to differentiate the Israeli people from their Regime. China on the other hand is a unitary one-party state, if you’re not in the party and at the right level of the party then you don’t have any voice. It’s a lot easier to separate the people of China from their government.

            • Knightfox@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              I don’t really like the use of the word colonizer in this context, it just doesn’t fit right with me. The definition technically fits, but colonization to me is more like an invasive species moving in and slowly overwhelming the native population. This is more akin to what we were seeing with settlers moving into the West Bank.

              What’s going on in Gaza is more akin to straight up scorched earth takeover and land theft. Hell, calling it an invasion and genocide feels more accurate.

              I never said I was ok with what Israel is doing, my argument was on the meaning of words. Leftists in general are really terrible about saying what they mean, because they don’t seem to know the meaning of the words they use.

              The cycle seems to go like this:

              • make a statement
              • realize the statement doesn’t mean what they wanted to say
              • double down and try to change the meaning of the words they used