• strawberry@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    no one reads that. didn’t even bother to look. should be more transparent IMO but whatever

    • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      If you don’t how are you supposed to know what information it’s telling you? It could shades of purple for all you know.

      • strawberry@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        well yea but this also isn’t like important stuff so I didn’t bother looking

          • strawberry@kbin.run
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 years ago

            you say that as if everyone analyses every aspect of everything they encounter. most people will glance at the graph, see a huge jump, and not look into it more. that’s why statistics are so easy to falsify or make misleading

            • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              If you want to engage in a conversation or use that information, yes you should properly read it. What could possibly be added to a discussion otherwise? Just having people have to correct and call out your bullshit? Lmfao.

              Since you are engaging in comments within a post about this, everyone would assume you read the graph properly, since you obviously can’t add to a conversation without actually knowing the information.

              So yes, leave your idiocy elsewhere next time, read the shit, or don’t add your opinion, really simple concept.