• SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you don’t how are you supposed to know what information it’s telling you? It could shades of purple for all you know.

    • strawberry@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      well yea but this also isn’t like important stuff so I didn’t bother looking

        • strawberry@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          you say that as if everyone analyses every aspect of everything they encounter. most people will glance at the graph, see a huge jump, and not look into it more. that’s why statistics are so easy to falsify or make misleading

          • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            If you want to engage in a conversation or use that information, yes you should properly read it. What could possibly be added to a discussion otherwise? Just having people have to correct and call out your bullshit? Lmfao.

            Since you are engaging in comments within a post about this, everyone would assume you read the graph properly, since you obviously can’t add to a conversation without actually knowing the information.

            So yes, leave your idiocy elsewhere next time, read the shit, or don’t add your opinion, really simple concept.