• mozz@mbin.grits.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Why do you want to use household / family income instead of individual income? Median personal income in constant dollars is independent of any confounding factors and doesn’t show the same drop; it shows no change at all.

    And yes, I could see this being consistent with what I was talking about. I actually already sent you data points (the link text is “fell by 5%”) showing the 10th, 50th (i.e. median), and 90th percentiles, which showed -1% change in real income at the 50th percentile. The census bureau numbers show +0.01% instead at the 50th percentile, but pretty similar.

    All of that is consistent with a boost for the lowest earners, which is what I’ve been saying this entire time. “Most of that growth happened at the lowest-wage end of the scale” is how I phrased it.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Because until that data says IRS, it’s far easier to collect household income, and far more applicable to things like rent and grocery costs. It doesn’t matter if one person’s income goes up, if the household income has gone down.

      • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        It doesn’t matter if one person’s income goes up

        I’m comfortable ending the conversation here