We’re (a group of friends) building a search engine from scratch to compete with DuckDuckGo. It still needs a name and logo.

Here’s some pictures (results not cherrypicked): https://imgur.com/a/eVeQKWB

Unique traits:

  • Written in pure Rust backend, HTML and CSS only on frontend - no JavaScript, PHP, SQL, etc…
  • Has a custom database, schema, engine, indexer, parser, and spider
  • Extensively themeable with CSS - theme submissions welcome
  • Only two crates used - TOML and Rocket (plus Rust’s standard library)
  • Homegrown index - not based on Google, Bing, Yandex, Baidu, or anything else
  • Pages are statically generated - super fast load times
  • If an onion link is available, an “Onion” button appears to the left of the clearnet URL
  • Easy to audit - No: JavaScript, WASM, etc… requests can be audited with F12 network tab
  • Works over Tor with strictest settings (official Tor hidden service address at the bottom of this post)
  • Allows for modifiers: hacker -news +youtube removes all results containing hacker news and only includes results that contain the word “youtube”
  • Optional tracker removal from results - on by default h No censorship - results are what they are (exception: underage material)
  • No ads in results - if we do ever have ads, they’ll be purely text in the bottom right corner, away from results, no media
  • Everything runs in memory, no user queries saved.
  • Would make Richard Stallman smile :)

THIS IS A PRE-ALPHA PRODUCT, it will get much MUCH better over the coming months. The dataset in the temporary hidden service linked below does not do our algorithm justice, its there to prove our concept. Please don’t judge the technology until beta.

Onion URL (hosted on my laptop since so many people asked for the link): ht6wt7cs7nbzn53tpcnliig6zrqyfuimoght2pkuyafz5lognv4uvmqd.onion

  • Orbituary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Personally I pay for Kagi which has been decent enough

    Whats “decent enough” mean? I’ve been curious and you’re the only person I’ve known who pays for it.

    • pacmondo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      I pay for it, the results are quality and the fact that my brain doesnt have to sift through ad results and can just look at the real data is so nice. Additionally, they have a large number of “lenses” which can change the scope of your search. For example, they have a lens for searching lemmy as well as lenses for the “small web”, which filters out all the results from massive corporate websites and gives way more personal project sites and the like.

      All in all I’m a fan.

      • sudneo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I personally like a lot the gazillion bangs also available, the personal up/downranking/blocking of websites and their quick answer is often fairly good (I mostly use it for documentation lookup). The lenses are definitely the best feature though, especially coupled with bangs. I converted even my wife who really loves it.

    • ParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      I never thought id pay for Kagi and that paying for a search engine was ridiculous. Then I kept seeing loudly positive feedback from reputable people in my circle and tried the trial.

      I pay for it and never have the “I only ever use !g on duckduckgo” problem.

      Sorting by web pages with least ad trackers is a cheat code to find old style websites with people sharing knowledge for knowledge’s sake rather than profit.

    • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Just my two cents, but I keep trying it out and I have not seen anything good enough to warrant paying for it. And I am not against paying for privacy, I pay Proton.