• BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why? Anything can be improved, and it’s a solid foundation.

    Based on this and your previous comments over the last few days I’m having a hard time believing you’re arguing in good faith here.

      • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        What’s bad about it? You haven’t actually said anything beyond your feelings on it.

        It’s not biased to ask for someone else’s thoughts lol.

          • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Right, so if we pay them more, give them a path to citizenship and an appeals process how would that be worse than completely eliminating for something else that doesn’t exist yet?

            Your mind seems made up on a rip and replace but there’s nothing else to replace it with, and it would be a lot easier to amend this thing which already exists than it would be to completely pass something else, and in the meantime between eliminating h1b and figuring out what else to do while immigrants who want to come here legally will have to wait.

                  • BobaFuttbucker@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    H1bs are more attainable because they can be petitioned by any company without a strict education requirement, can be extended, does not discriminate on position or require work history with the employer.

                    In many circumstances, h1b is the simpler process.

                    I agree a simplification would be beneficial, so why are congressional Republicans making immigration reform legislation and then voting it down?