Because I’m not a computer scientist so I can’t understand the sentiment analysis and come up with appropriate hypotheses?

You were able to do it for me, so there’s no reason you can’t for someone else.

Because I’m not a computer scientist so I can’t understand the sentiment analysis and come up with appropriate hypotheses?

That’s the part you might be having troubles with.

I’ve tried telling you that a couple times now.

Maybe work on your reading comprehension.

I’m glad you proved my point that you are unwilling or unable to perform the same analysis that you claimed you did on me.

Oh, that’s the reason you won’t, right?

Because I’m not a computer scientist so I can’t understand the sentiment analysis and come up with appropriate hypotheses?

You were able to for me so why aren’t you able to again?

Ok.

I’d be selling it to Google, Facebook or Reddit for many millions but keep using your amazing moderation tool on me buddy.

I’m curious what would happen if you use it on UniversalMonk?

But I almost guarantee there’s a reason why you can’t or won’t.

You like fish sticks between your buns?

You’re trying to say 50% of my comments are accusing people of arguing in bad faith?

I think I’d test the model if I were you.

No, you’re pretty much stating you created a tool to detect trolling better than any tech company has and you’re using it on me.

Or you’re just drawing random graphs.

The next experiment I ran was the test (on all of your comments, not just the ones mentioning Biden) was the hypothesis “The author of this reply {} Biden.”, with h0 being “is being abusive, or trolling.” and h1 being “is being honest and genuine.”. I ran this test on all comments

By what basis do you consider a comment abusive or trolling?

You defended him to the point of calling any one asking to remove him a trolls, bots, and Russian assets.

Don’t forget this is what you’re trying to prove, and you make a bunch of charts that don’t really prove anything instead.

That goes well with my idea of pooping.

I think you misunderstood my comment.

Anyways, I’ll wait.

Have fun!

You’ll just say I deleted comments, the truth doesn’t matter much to some people.

You defended him to the point of calling any one asking to remove him a trolls, bots, and Russian assets.

No.

Fair.

Im half expecting you to call for Biden to re-run again.

Look at it in the Lemmy.world instance, not all submissions are federated to yours.

I assure you my numbers are accurate.

I tried to give you the benefit of the doubt, I tried to have a real dialogue, and you just double down on the trolling.

You answer that with four of your own questions.

1. Such as?

2. What is the obvious dishonesty?

3. Let me guess, me asking that question is “sealioning,” right?

4. Is this where you are gonna reply with the sea lion comic?

The technique of sealioning has been compared to the Gish gallop and metaphorically described as a denial-of-service attack targeted at human beings (i.e. overloading a target with questions).[6]

I loved that video of her swaying to music for thirty-nine minutes.

In the seventy days since this account was created it has made five thousand seven hundred and fifty-eight submissions to Lemmy.

That averages out to once every seventeen minutes and thirty seconds, twenty-four hours a day seven days a week.

If they spend eight hours a day on Lemmy Monday to Friday that’s a a submission every four minutes and ten seconds.

and of posting “every 17 minutes,” which is just laughable considering the timestamps are right there for anyone to see.

In the seventy days since this account was created it has made five thousand seven hundred and fifty-eight submissions to Lemmy.

That averages out to once every seventeen minutes and thirty seconds, twenty-four hours a day seven days a week.

If they spend eight hours a day on Lemmy Monday to Friday that’s a a submission every four minutes and ten seconds.