3volver@lemmy.world to Unpopular Opinion@lemmy.world · 1 year agoYou can't claim to be an environmentalist and be anti-nuclear energy at the same timemessage-squaremessage-square69fedilinkarrow-up150arrow-down130
arrow-up120arrow-down1message-squareYou can't claim to be an environmentalist and be anti-nuclear energy at the same time3volver@lemmy.world to Unpopular Opinion@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square69fedilink
minus-squareMaxMalRichtig@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up24arrow-down10·1 year agoOf course you can. Because nuclear energy is NOT a solution. Especially not in the long run.
minus-squareRememberTheApollo_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·1 year agoThis is accurate, however we can’t sacrifice good enough for the perfect we don’t have yet. I get there is no solution that lasts longer than a temporary one, but environmentally, nuclear absolutely should be implemented.
minus-squarespujb@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoyou make a weird assumption that a solution that can’t work forever won’t work as a transition strategy
Of course you can. Because nuclear energy is NOT a solution. Especially not in the long run.
This is accurate, however we can’t sacrifice good enough for the perfect we don’t have yet. I get there is no solution that lasts longer than a temporary one, but environmentally, nuclear absolutely should be implemented.
you make a weird assumption that a solution that can’t work forever won’t work as a transition strategy