I’ve also seen US teachers spending hundreds of dollars out of their own pockets to stock classrooms.

I spent a lot of time in European schools and I’ve never heard of teachers having to stock their own classrooms or fundraise for things like playgrounds, etc.

  • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Because education in the US is a fucking joke, just like everything else in this shithole country.

    Edid: sorry i was in a shitty mood earlier lol

    • ChillPenguin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Don’t apologize. This America isn’t the same image our grandparents had of America. What we are seeing now are the deep rooted problems and the true America. Our country is a fucking joke.

  • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    It wasn’t always the case. Back when I was a kid, the school provided most things. Textbooks, crayons, paper, scissors, glue, etc. I had to bring myself, a pencil and eraser, and a notebook.

    Somewhere along the line they figured out they could be pocketing that money instead of spending it on the kids, let the parents deal with the expenditures. Now you’ve got superintendents with quarter of a million dollar salary, over-budgeted construction projects that aren’t always necessary (and they arent allowed to reallocate those funds elsewhere, so they just construct more bullshit), and they still find the time to screw over the teachers (who are making as much as a highly paid retail employee).

  • CM400@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Our schools are generally underfunded and hardly anyone with any real power gives two shits.

    • DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Our schools are generally purposefully underfunded and hardly anyone any Conservative with any real power gives two shits, because indoctrination is more important than education to Conservatives.

      There, now that’s a much more correct statement rather than that both-sides bullcrap.

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Conservatives, mostly.

    Conservatives believe in neither education nor government. It’s no surprise that when they have power, they fuck up both of those things.

    Also racism. A common facet of conservatism. It’s part of why conservatives don’t like public programs- the wrong sort of people might benefit.

    • nutsack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      the conservative point ive been hearing is that government shouldn’t spend money on education, because the real problem is fatherless households. im not really sure what to do with it

      • Kit Sorens@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s a smoke screen. Another is the “liberal brainwashing machine” school system scare. What they fear is the statistic that higher educated individuals trend towards populism and progressivism. They see higher education of youths as a threat to their political base, which turns into “spineless parents sending kids to liberul brainwashing camps funded by the gubmnt.”

      • Xanis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Find out what they believe causes a household to be fatherless. Follow their logic string by asking follow-up questions based on their most recent response. Either they’ll run out of justification quickly, or they’ll back themselves into a corner. From here you can leave it be as they’ve essentially ended up causing them to question their own understanding.

        One way of many.

        • Jojo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Also find out what consequences they expect a child being “fatherless” to bring, and compare that to what actually happens when a child has a healthy household without a father in it.

  • vortic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Many people here are talking about under-funding of education in the US. If you look at expenditure per student vs GDP per capita, the US is actually doing fairly well when compared to the rest of the world. Our problems aren’t funding related (though I wouldn’t argue against more funding). Our problems are allocation and priority related.

    See here for data: https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cmd/education-expenditures-by-country

    • PancakeBrock@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I do construction. My company is building a new $40,000,000 school in a town with a population of 143.

      • vortic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Wow, how many students are they expecting? I assume they’ll be pulling from a lot of the surrounding area.

        • PancakeBrock@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          That I really don’t know online it says 97 kids in k-12. It’s in a very rural area and the second phase of construction not in the original bid for the school is housing so when they hire more teachers they have a place to live.

          While I don’t think it’s bad they are getting a new school but going with the op it is kind of crazy when they can do that but my kids teachers ask us to supply the classroom with all kinds of stuff.

    • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      The problem is multiplied by the fact that the people who are supposed to figure out how to be efficient with the money are either elected or paid way below market rate. So either way, they don’t have the skills for it.

  • Neato@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Schools are sabotaged. They underfund the actual school so they can’t afford common supplies like this, or repair their AC or building upkeep, etc. They vastly underpay teachers so there are fewer of them, increasing workload per teacher so there’s more burnout and less effective teaching. They make wedge issues like the book bans, sex ed and anti-trans bills that prevent teachers teaching the obvious reality in order to increase anger at teachers to burn more out. They pass bills that allow people to take their taxes out of schools to move to other schools in richer areas or to keep if they homeschool (to indoctrinate).

    They are the US republicans and the purpose of this is to ensure the most amount of poorer people are uneducated, don’t get a chance to get higher education. Which leads to ensuring fewer have well-paying jobs, and more people live desperately and can’t quit their jobs, move or exercise their right to assembly. This ensures a life-long near-slave caste of workers so billionaires have cheap labor and who are easily manipulated emotionally through fear keeping Republicans in power.

  • Psiczar@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    In Australia, for a public school student, the school provides a list of pencils, pens, glue etc the child will need for the year. You can choose to buy it from wherever but there are school suppliers that will provide everything in a pack for a fee and deliver it to your door.

    There is no expectation that the teacher would pay for anything out of their pocket.

  • TheaoneAndOnly27@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    My partner is a teacher and we spend around $200 a month just on snacks for their classroom (snacks have to be individually packaged, and there’s 36 kids per class, so that’s 72 snacks a day, Because the kids have a morning snack and an afternoon snack.) Even with donors, choose PTA and other groups. We just know that there’s a certain amount of our income each month that’s going to go too supporting her classroom. It sucks but we have accepted it, because by us not doing that the kids are just going to suffer.

    • mke_geek@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It sounds like you’re enabling the problem by continuing to spend the money.