The sun dial worked during daylight, but how did people agree on what time it was at night before clocks were invented?

  • PilferJynx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    The only thing is that it severely limits the options to meet somewhere when all you got is dawn, noon, and dusk.

    • ZephrC@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Sure, but pretending you’re all going to meet at exactly 4:37 or whatever is just lie. Nobody is actually accurate down to the minute in their casual lives, and using units that are more precise than they are accurate is just lying about your accuracy. You can use modern clocks without pretending that single minutes matter. That’s why some people still talk about things like quarter hours even when using digital clocks. That’s a much more human kind of timescale.

        • ZephrC@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Hey, if you live in a place where the public transport actually shows up when it’s supposed to that’s nice for you, I guess, but where I’m from pretending that the public transport is accurate down to the minute is also a lie.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Matters for public transport tbh

          Which didn’t operate on that strict a time schedule (if at all) in the time period OP is asking about.

          • Flax@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Fair. I’d hate to show up to my bus 5 minutes early just to realise it left 10 minutes early, though

      • PilferJynx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yep, quarter hours are how we normally function today. Which is fine and I wholly agree. You still need the second for that system to function though, as you can’t get that without measuring time.

        • ZephrC@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I mean, the actual length of a second is pretty arbitrary. We could use a different basic unit of time and still be fine, but I get the point you’re making. I was never trying to argue that the invention of the clock was a bad thing, just that modern society has a problem with overly precise “measurement” of things that themselves aren’t actually as consistent as the measurements.