A who’s who of Cardassian officers and Bajoran collaborators (Darhe’el, for example) were persona non grata at best, and arrested to face charges of war crimes at worst. I can imagine that, if there were no specific incidents which could be linked to Gul Dukat, perhaps he and other Cardassian officials would be tolerated… But as he was the head of the occupation, I’m not sure this makes sense.

Is the best explanation that this is merely a matter of convenience to normalize relations between Bajor and Cardassia, or is there a plausible justification for his semi-frequent visits to DS9 and/or Bajor in the early seasons? What real historical examples are analogous to his relationship with the Bajoran (provisional) government?

Edit: ‘Bajor’ for the planet, not ‘Bajoran’

  • gregorum@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Yeah, at least in the beginning, Dukat only ever lurked nearby, menacingly. The first time he set foot on the station was to help Starfleet deal with what turned out to be the beginnings of the Maquis, during a conflict in the DMZ. That was also incredibly complicated. (Edit: and everyone was pretty pissed that he was the one Cardassia sent).

    Everything on DS9 was incredibly complicated. That’s why I liked it so much. 

    • rtxn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      9 months ago

      “It’s just a station? That stays in one place? How can it measure up to the galaxy-spanning adventures of TNG?”

      Three seasons later it had its hooks in me and wasn’t letting go.

      • mercano@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        9 months ago

        Staying in one spot was an asset, it helped justify recurring guests and villains if everyone’s in the same neighborhood. There’s no way the Kazon should have been bothering Voyager after Season 1 if they had been making a bee line for the Alpha Quadrant.

      • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        Babylon 5 showed a young me that space stations were magnets for trouble while ships had to see what they could find.

      • gregorum@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        To be fair, DS9 had far less to do with exploring space and much more to do with the intense political intrigue of one specific part of space.

      • Corgana@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        One of my favorite fun facts to throw at people who dismissed DS9 for that reason is that TNG actually has more bottle episodes (where the ship in effectively “goes nowhere”) than DS9.

      • PhilTheTrill81@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        As my first lemmy comment:

        I wish my dad would understand this. Trekky through and through EXCEPT he refuses to watch DS9 because in his view it CAN’T be startrek. Actually insane.