Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
ZeroCool@slrpnk.net to Enough Musk Spam@lemmy.world · 1 year ago

Elon Musk's company directors feel an 'expectation' to use drugs with him to avoid upsetting the billionaire, report says

www.businessinsider.com

external-link
message-square
285
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • [email protected]
463
external-link

Elon Musk's company directors feel an 'expectation' to use drugs with him to avoid upsetting the billionaire, report says

www.businessinsider.com

ZeroCool@slrpnk.net to Enough Musk Spam@lemmy.world · 1 year ago
message-square
285
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • [email protected]
Some of Elon Musk's company directors are said to feel an 'expectation' to use drugs with him to avoid upsetting the billionaire
www.businessinsider.com
external-link
Peers and directors of Elon Musk's companies are said to feel pressured to use drugs with him, per The Wall Street Journal.
  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh, okay, then I guess people are still ‘retarded’ and not ‘low-functioning autistic.’

    • Sagifurius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Changing the name didn’t change the reality, jfc

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You do know that scientific terminology changes to reflect accuracy, right?

        • Sagifurius@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s not the argument you were making.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s exactly the argument I was making.

            • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              you were trying, but you were wrong, having misunderstand reclassification as nullification.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                What?

            • Sagifurius@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              No, it really wasn’t.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m pretty sure I know what I was talking about better than you do.

                • Sagifurius@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  There’s these things called words you used to express a thought, and it clearly wasn’t what you now say it was.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Ah, got it, you know me better than I do.

            • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              You really wish that, that much is obvious

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I really wish I was making the argument I was making? Okay…

      • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        dude that is wayyy too hard for people

    • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      this, however, i am all for

    • TypicalHog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        People can absolutely be retarded

        Wow.

        And your evidence for that is a website for an app.

        Jesus.

        • TypicalHog@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s the first link that explained the difference I came across.

          Wait, do you think people can not have mental retardation? What?

          Ok, here Wikipedia instead:

          “Mental retardation, also known as intellectual disability, a disorder characterized by significantly impaired cognitive functioning and deficits in adaptive behaviors.”

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            And now you’re lying about what’s on Wikipedia.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Mental_retardation&redirect=no

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_disability

            Furthermore-

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_disability#Terminology

            Did you think I wouldn’t check?

            • TypicalHog@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Actually, I have gotten my snippet from a different page:

              See first thing under “Medicine and biology” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retardation

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Your snipped links to the page I provided screenshots for and linked to. The one that literally says ‘retardation’ is considered outdated and offensive. Again, nice try.

                • TypicalHog@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yes. The one I took the snippet from is the first one that opened when I clicked the search result. I didn’t know it was outdated as I didn’t do a deep dive. I also didn’t know retardation got renamed either. Sry, my bad. The term retarded means slow btw. The reason it got a negative connotation is because people used it negatively. I’m fairly certain the word is still widely used and also do I really need to like check like every word before I say it because it may or may not be the official one anymore?

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    do I really need to like check like every word before I say it because it may or may not be the official one anymore?

                    When that is your claim? Yes you do.

Enough Musk Spam@lemmy.world

enoughmuskspam@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 7 users / day
  • 635 users / week
  • 2.74K users / month
  • 12.7K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 3.13K subscribers
  • 832 Posts
  • 13.7K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Dr. Jordan B. Peterson@lemmy.world
  • anon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
  • BE: 0.19.9
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org