• theotherverion@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      So far the international court has not decided on the genocide case, so it’s incorrect to accuse them of genocide now.

      • beardown@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        South Africa has accused them of genocide. You’re saying South Africa, a former apartheid regime that has since been liberated, is incorrect to do so? What gives you the authority to judge them so? Obviously it isn’t because you’ve read their filings with the International Court of Justice

        • theotherverion@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Exactly, nothing gives me the authority to judge it. Same applies to you. As long as final decision is not made, we cannot accuse them of genocide.

            • theotherverion@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I mean any state can go there. I also can go to the local court and say that someone is a mass murderer. However, until the court does not make the final decision, the person is considered innocent.

              • beardown@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I have read and believe South Africa’s filings. It is clear to me that Israel is choosing to carry out genocide and I will speak and act accordingly

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The UN definition is public knowledge. It’s not like it’s a secret we have to wait for the clerics to decipher. What they’re doing meets the definition.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Because half the ministry and the PM saying they need to clear it out and settle it isn’t proof of intent?

            • theotherverion@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I doubt it is half of the government but some radicals support it. That’s, of course, awful and will make Israel’s life harder.

              However, this logic cannot be 100% applied because in our parliament, we have a Nazi party and that does not equal we are a Nazi state.