• I_Has_A_Hat@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    If we’re being technical, then it’s the one you crossed out that says

    Law. the killing of another human being under conditions specifically covered in law.

    Because CBC is using murder as a legal definition, not common parlance, and it doesn’t fit the legal definition of murder. But I get it, you don’t want technicalities.

    • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Because CBC is using murder as a legal definition…

      [citation needed]

      But I get it, you don’t want technicalities.

      I don’t want FUCKING LEGAL DEFINITIONS in a FUCKING NON-LEGAL CONTEXT you UTTER FUCKING IDIOT. For a pedant you FUCKING SUCK at words.

      Stop digging. You don’t get out of a deep hole of idiocy that you’ve dug for yourself by digging harder. Just shut the fuck up you idiot.

      • blunderworld@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I don’t even disagree with you, but you’re not helping your argument by throwing a tantrum. If you can’t communicate your point without resorting to name calling, you should probably just say nothing.