• Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    While this would certainly help the glacier from breaking apart, the effort required would be imense and a geotechnical nightmare. Building dikes above ground is tough enough as is.

    On top of that we are warming so quickly. I don’t see how this would stop the sheet from melting from air temperature/solar radiation

    • Wanderer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’d imagine the water makes in melt a lot quicker.

      On a cold day at like 4c or in your fridge. Put a large ice cube on something insulating and put a similar ice cube in a large bucket of water.

      It’s why if you go through the ice into the water you should roll around in the snow. The most important thing is to be dry.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yes. Same is true of all the construction involved in relocating people as sea levels rise

  • jafffacakelemmy@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    if the 500 million was spent putting up wind turbines and solar panels you’d save more gkaciers melting overall and make a profit.

  • atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    In the realm of crazy ideas, why not flood parts of the Sahara? Build a canal from the closest sea and just let it drain into there. There are also areas in Australia that were one great lakes that could also have a canal or two built to them from the ocean and flooded. Given the temperature in those places, it might make enough condensation to rejuvenate those and surrounding areas with the precipitation.